Compared to unassisted diagnosis, AI significantly improved pooled sensitivity (87%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 84-89%, versus 73%, 95% CI: 69-78%) and maintained high specificity (95%, 95% CI: 92-97%, versus 94%, 95% CI: 89-96%).
Objective We systematically evaluated the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted interpretation versus independent physician assessment for fracture detection. Materials and methods Adhering to PRISMA-DTA guidelines, we searched PubMed and Web of Science for original studies published up to September 17, 2025.
- Impact 30%
- 69
- Evidence 25%
- 95
- Scale 20%
- 35
- Confidence 15%
- 87
- Recency 10%
- 96
Updated Sep 19, 2026 · TRV-2026-1145
ace