About Truvace

Artificial intelligence is doing real good. It is doing real harm. Both are true at once, and both deserve a source. Truvace keeps the record.

2,011sourced claims on the record
1,067documented gains
944documented problems
0vendor press releases counted as evidence

A letter from the founder

Why I started Truvace

I started Truvace because the story of artificial intelligence was being told from so many different angles by so many people and our varying opinions. On one side, companies announce that their products will transform medicine, education, and work. On the other, you see streets full of people protesting against the same thing these companies are promising benefits from. Both stories are easy to tell. Neither is the complete record.

What was missing was a record. Somewhere a nurse, a teacher, a policymaker, or a curious reader could go and ask a plain question: is this technology helping or hurting, here, measurably? And get an answer traced to a peer-reviewed study, a government finding, or independent reporting, not a press release. Somewhere the gain and the problem sit on the same page, because in the real world they almost always arrive together.

That is what Truvace is. Ironically we also use machines to sweep the research literature and the news around the clock, but they don’t get the last word. A human editor weighs every claim before it earns a place in Problem Space, Good Space, or The Trace.

AI is going to keep reshaping how we live, work, heal, and learn, unevenly and not always fairly. The people living through that deserve better than hype and better than doom. They deserve the truth.

Mosisa SabaMosisa Saba, founder of Truvace

Method

How a story becomes a record

  1. 1

    Sweep

    Machines read the research literature, government releases, and independent reporting around the clock and gather candidate claims.

  2. 2

    Source check

    A claim only moves forward if it traces to a peer-reviewed paper, a government body, or independent journalism. A company describing its own product is discarded.

  3. 3

    Editor’s call

    A human editor weighs the evidence and files it as a gain in Good Space, a problem in Problem Space, or both at once in The Trace.

  4. 4

    Permanent record

    Published claims get a record ID, a version history, and a citation anyone can verify. Revisions are logged in public, with a reason.

Principles

How we publish

Sourced only.

Every item traces to a peer-reviewed paper, a government body, or independent journalism. Never a company reporting on its own product. If it can’t be sourced, it doesn’t run.

Both readings.

The gain and the problem get the same rigor, side by side. When the evidence leaves a real boundary or counterargument, we name it plainly so neither direction reads as a pitch.

Human judgment.

Machines gather candidates, but Problem Space, Good Space, and The Trace are editorial claims. A person weighs the evidence before anything earns those labels.

Get involved

Seen something we should trace?

Truvace runs on sourced tips and careful contributors. Send us a story worth tracing, or join the editorial bench.

Corrections, press, and everything else: team@truvace.com