Truace
Subscribe
The Index recomputed live from the record

What the evidence says.What the public feels.

The record holds 932 sourced gains and 770 sourced problems, averaging 68 and 66 on the index score. Readers have logged 22 public signals on the Pulse, which is kept apart and never counted as evidence.

932 gains
770 problems
Every sourced claim in the Index, one square each, shaded by the strength of its evidence. High Moderate Emerging

Ranks distinct AI gain and problem claims from the published record. Scores reward impact, independent source strength, scale, confidence, and recency.

1,702 results
Show filters and sorting

Download every matching row, not just this page:Export CSVExport JSON

AI gains · 932

757
CrimeStableModerate evidence · 1 source

Trust and Safety defenders can use generative AI to detect and mitigate harmful content at scale and support investigations and moderator wellbeing.

On April 13, 2026, a peer-reviewed CHI paper reported a qualitative study of 43 Trust & Safety experts across child safety, election integrity, hate and harassment, scams, and violent extremism. It found generative AI both expands attacker capabilities and offers new defensive tools for detection and mitigation.

Impact 30%
49
Evidence 25%
95
Scale 20%
35
Confidence 15%
87
Recency 10%
83

Updated Jul 13, 2026 · TRV-2026-0197

67Index score
758
ScienceStableModerate evidence · 1 source

ApexGO generated optimized peptide derivatives that showed enhanced antimicrobial activity in vitro and potent anti-infective efficacy in mouse models of Acinetobacter baumannii infection.

Researchers developed ApexGO, a generative AI approach that modifies existing peptide scaffolds using a transformer variational autoencoder and Bayesian optimization. Using ten template peptides, the system proposed optimized derivatives, 100 of which were synthesized and tested in vitro and in two mouse models of Acinetobacter baumannii infection.

Impact 30%
49
Evidence 25%
95
Scale 20%
35
Confidence 15%
87
Recency 10%
83

Updated Jul 13, 2026 · TRV-2026-0193

67Index score
759
EducationStableModerate evidence · 1 source

Art students classified as enthusiastic explorers and human-centered directors report using generative AI as a controllable tool that enables novel expression and co-agency in creative work.

Published February 28 2026, this peer-reviewed study examined how art students negotiate creative identity when working with generative AI. Forty students from visual arts, design, music, and animation sorted 42 statements about collaboration, authorship, ethics, and control, and factor analysis revealed five distinct perspectives ranging from human-centered direction to enthusiastic exploration.

Impact 30%
49
Evidence 25%
95
Scale 20%
35
Confidence 15%
87
Recency 10%
83

Updated Jul 13, 2026 · TRV-2026-0188

67Index score
760
HealthStableModerate evidence · 1 source

University students in Qatar reported willingness to use AI-based mental health tools for stress management as a complement to human care, valuing lower cost and round-the-clock access.

On 2026-05-06 a peer-reviewed survey study reported results from 220 university students in Qatar about AI in mental health support. Students reported low-to-moderate awareness and trust, said they were prepared to use AI for stress management but did not want it to replace face-to-face therapy, and cited benefits of cost reduction and 24/7 accessibility alongside concerns about human interaction, overreliance and diagnostic accuracy.

Impact 30%
49
Evidence 25%
95
Scale 20%
35
Confidence 15%
87
Recency 10%
83

Updated Jul 13, 2026 · TRV-2026-0184

67Index score

AI problems · 770

760
LifestyleStableModerate evidence · 1 source

Almost 50 years after he first got his hands on a computer, the Oxford professor still believes in the power of technology. Can his beloved game theory explain why Silicon Valley’s entrepreneurs consistently misuse it?

Machine-ingested summary: the claims above reflect a single primary source and have not been weighed against contradicting evidence by a Truvace editor yet.

Impact 30%
49
Evidence 25%
62
Scale 20%
35
Confidence 15%
34
Recency 10%
82

Updated Jul 11, 2026 · TRV-2026-0034

51Index score

Recomputed live from the record · Oct 11, 2026, 11:28 AM