TruaceTracing the truth around AISunday, September 20, 2026
TRV-2026-1128Version 1 · Certified

Written 2026-09-18 06:54:56 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Certified into the record

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-1128
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-09-18T06:54:56.809426Z
status: published
lens: g_space
sector: health
headline: Development of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Reflux Esophagitis Among Candidates for Metabolic Bariatric Surgery
dek: Background Reflux esophagitis (RE) is a common gastroesophageal disorder among candidates for metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). This study aimed to develop and internally validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model for predicting preoperative RE risk among patients undergoing MBS. Methods This retrospective study included 1,068 MBS candidates who were randomly divided into training and internal test cohorts (7:3). Feature selection was performed using correlation analysis, multicollinearity assessment,…
gain_title: An explainable XGBoost model using six routine preoperative variables enabled individualized reflux esophagitis risk prediction for metabolic bariatric surgery candidates with AUC 0.881 training and 0.825 internal test.
problem_title: (none)
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: An explainable XGBoost model using six routine preoperative variables enabled individualized reflux esophagitis risk prediction for metabolic bariatric surgery candidates with AUC 0.881 training and 0.825 internal test.
gain_evidence: The online tool developed based on the final XGB model enabled individualized RE risk prediction. | The model demonstrated acceptable predictive performance and interpretability and may assist in preoperative RE risk stratification and perioperative risk management. | achieving AUC values of 0.881 and 0.825 in the training and internal test cohorts, respectively
problem_reading: (none)
problem_evidence: (none)
quick_read: In a retrospective study published September 17, 2026, researchers developed and internally validated machine learning models to predict preoperative reflux esophagitis among 1,068 metabolic bariatric surgery candidates. After feature selection, six routine variables were used, and an XGBoost model achieved the best performance with AUCs of 0.881 in training and 0.825 in internal testing, supported by SHAP interpretation and an online risk tool.

The tool offers a practical way to stratify RE risk before surgery using routinely available clinical data, potentially informing perioperative management. As of the publication date, performance is based only on internal validation, and the authors note that external validation in independent cohorts is needed before broader clinical use.
limitation: Model was only internally validated in a single retrospective cohort; external validation is still required to assess robustness and generalizability.
tag: Evidence-backed gain
key_points: Retrospective study of 1,068 MBS candidates, 280 (26.2%) diagnosed with RE, split 7:3 training and internal test. | Feature selection via correlation analysis, multicollinearity assessment, LASSO regression, and Boruta algorithm selected Sex, Hp, BMI, TG, HGB, and HC. | Six ML algorithms evaluated; XGB showed best overall performance with SHAP analysis identifying TG, BMI, Hp, HC, HGB, and Sex as major contributors. | Authors built an online risk assessment tool based on final XGB model for individualized prediction.
rundown: The study included 1,068 candidates for metabolic bariatric surgery, with 280 cases of reflux esophagitis identified preoperatively. Data were randomly divided into training and internal test cohorts at a 7:3 ratio for model development and evaluation.

Six predictors were retained after selection: Sex, Hp, BMI, TG, HGB, and HC. Six machine learning algorithms were compared on AUC, calibration, and classification metrics, with SHAP used for interpretation and an online tool deployed for individualized risk calculation.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | Obesity Surgery | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-026-08943-4 | 2026-09-17
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sha256
c74a77a4c82b3af474af40889533822aee6f0fbc7163ec46b74d7617da3b1177
previous
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1128 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.