Voice pass: plainer wording and study attribution; no facts or figures changed.
The exact text we saved
This is the version exactly as it was saved, character for character. The SHA-256 hash below is a 64-character code worked out from that text. Run the same text through SHA-256 and you get the same code; change a single letter and the code comes out completely different. Each version also stores the previous version’s hash, which chains them together so no version can be swapped out quietly.
TRUVACE RECORD VERSION record: TRV-2026-2377 version: 2 kind: revised reason: Voice pass: plainer wording and study attribution; no facts or figures changed. timestamp: 2026-11-05T11:19:21.982052Z status: published lens: g_space sector: education headline: The influence of institutional policies and ChatGPT usage levels on dependence through utilization in higher education dek: The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, has transformed learning practices in higher education while raising concerns about student dependency and academic integrity. Although previous studies have primarily examined the effects of AI usage intensity, limited attention has been given to how institutional policies shape AI utilization and subsequently influence dependency. This study addresses this gap by examining the effects of ChatGPT usage level and institutional p… gain_title: In a survey of 113 students at one Indonesian polytechnic, higher-quality ChatGPT utilization was significantly associated with lower dependency, and institutional policies raised that utilization. problem_title: (none) trace_subject: (none) gain_reading: In a survey of 113 students at one Indonesian polytechnic, higher-quality ChatGPT utilization was significantly associated with lower dependency, and institutional policies raised that utilization. gain_evidence: ChatGPT utilization has a significant negative effect on dependency | institutional policies significantly enhance ChatGPT utilization problem_reading: (none) problem_evidence: (none) quick_read: A study of 113 students at Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Semarang in Indonesia found that institutional policies significantly increased how well students utilized ChatGPT, and that better utilization was linked to lower dependency on the tool. Policies did not affect dependency directly. Instead, ChatGPT utilization fully mediated the link between policy and dependency, so policy worked only by shaping how students used the tool. How often students used ChatGPT influenced neither utilization nor dependency. The authors argue this shifts attention from frequency-based views to utilization-oriented approaches to responsible AI adoption in higher education. The data come from a single institution, so the pattern cannot be assumed to hold elsewhere. limitation: The findings come from 113 students at one Indonesian polytechnic, which limits how far they can be generalized to other institutions. tag: Evidence-backed gain key_points: The sample was 113 students at Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Semarang, Indonesia, chosen by stratified random sampling. | Data were analyzed with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in SmartPLS 3. | Institutional policies significantly enhanced ChatGPT utilization but had no direct effect on dependency. | ChatGPT utilization had a significant negative effect on dependency. | The level of ChatGPT usage did not significantly influence utilization or dependency. | Utilization fully mediated the relationship between institutional policies and dependency. rundown: The study used a quantitative design with stratified random sampling of 113 students at a single Indonesian maritime polytechnic, modeling relationships among institutional policies, ChatGPT usage level, utilization and dependency using PLS-SEM. Results showed that policies mattered through utilization rather than directly. Usage intensity, the focus of earlier research, had no significant effect on either utilization or dependency. The authors recommend that institutions prioritize policies promoting AI literacy, set clear ethical guidelines, integrate ChatGPT into learning activities with supervision, and encourage reflective rather than passive use. sources: - peer_reviewed | International Journal of Education and Learning | https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v8i3.3046 | 2026-12-31 prev: d312d1064dc311185bdbdc6480bd06fa552eb69fa8045661830e48882af176ea
- SHA-256 hash
- 4326d141d759c74cf64a0914a090163e3e1227ce0c5fd3361dc4494ef423f2d4
- Previous version’s hash
- d312d1064dc311185bdbdc6480bd06fa552eb69fa8045661830e48882af176ea
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2377 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.
ace