TruaceTracing the truth around AIWednesday, August 5, 2026
TRV-2026-0537Version 1 · Certified

Written 2026-07-24 00:33:01 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Certified into the record

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-0537
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-07-24T00:33:01.524340Z
status: published
lens: trace
sector: health
headline: PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods
dek: The Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) is used to assess the quality, risk of bias, and applicability of prediction models or algorithms and of prediction model/algorithm studies. Since PROBAST’s introduction in 2019, much progress has been made in the methodology for prediction modelling and in the use of artificial intelligence, including machine learning, techniques. An update to PROBAST-2019 is thus needed. This article describes the development of PROBAST+AI. PROBAST+AI consists of two…
gain_title: PROBAST+AI provides a unified tool that lets stakeholders assess quality, bias, and applicability of both regression and AI-based prediction models in healthcare.
problem_title: The original 2019 PROBAST tool had become outdated given rapid progress in prediction modelling methodology and AI including machine learning.
trace_subject: quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment of prediction models using regression or AI in healthcare
gain_reading: PROBAST+AI provides a unified tool that lets stakeholders assess quality, bias, and applicability of both regression and AI-based prediction models in healthcare.
gain_evidence: allows all key stakeholders (eg, model developers, AI companies, researchers, editors, reviewers, healthcare professionals, guideline developers, and policy organisations) to examine the quality, risk of bias, and applicability of any type of prediction model in the healthcare sector
problem_reading: The original 2019 PROBAST tool had become outdated given rapid progress in prediction modelling methodology and AI including machine learning.
problem_evidence: An update to PROBAST-2019 is thus needed | much progress has been made in the methodology for prediction modelling and in the use of artificial intelligence, including machine learning, techniques
quick_read: Published March 24 2025 in the BMJ, this methods article describes PROBAST+AI, an updated assessment tool for prediction models built with regression or artificial intelligence methods. It splits assessment into model development and model evaluation, each organized around participants and data sources, predictors, outcome, and analysis domains.

The update matters because clinical prediction models increasingly use AI and machine learning, raising stakes for biased or non-applicable models in patient care. The paper offers a standardized way to scrutinize them, but does not report empirical validation, adoption rates, or impact on clinical outcomes, leaving real-world effectiveness uncertain.
limitation: 
tag: Automated dual reading
key_points: PROBAST+AI consists of two distinctive parts: model development with 16 signalling questions and model evaluation with 18 signalling questions. | Both parts contain four domains: participants and data sources, predictors, outcome, and analysis, with applicability rated for three domains. | Tool is intended to replace PROBAST-2019 and apply irrespective of whether regression modelling or AI techniques are used.
rundown: The authors describe development of PROBAST+AI as an update to the 2019 PROBAST tool, structured into model development and model evaluation components with 16 and 18 targeted signalling questions respectively.

The tool retains four domains across both parts and is positioned to be used by model developers, AI companies, researchers, editors, reviewers, healthcare professionals, guideline developers and policy organisations for any prediction model type in healthcare.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | BMJ | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-082505 | 2025-03-24
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sha256
66c6f5b04957374aa6cb7deac8bbdaf023cc27c8cda914ce9b4a1ebe7437bf69
previous
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0537 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.