LEGAL CHALLENGES OF AI-GENERATED CONTENT UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW: AN INDIAN PERSPECTIVE
LEGAL CHALLENGES OF AI-GENERATED CONTENT UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW: AN INDIAN PERSPECTIVE Sanya Singh, B.A. LLB. (H), 7th Semester, Student at Amity University Gurugram (India) Prerna Sihag, B.A. LLB. (H), 7th Semester, Student at Amity University Gurugram (India) Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2026.v04.215 Artificial intelligence has changed how creative content is made — and Indian copyright law simply Artificial intelligence has changed how creative content is made — and Indian copyright law simply has…
In India, creators and users face unresolved copyright risk because the 1957 Act does not define ownership of AI-generated works or the legality of training on copyrighted data.
Analysis is bounded to Indian law and notes that the Copyright Act of 1957 was written for human creators and is relatively silent on autonomous AI generation, leaving ownership and training-data legality unresolved.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedLawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research2026-06-01
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0144, v1: “LEGAL CHALLENGES OF AI-GENERATED CONTENT UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW: AN INDIAN PERSPECTIVE.” Truvace, 2026-07-13. /record/TRV-2026-0144 (accessed at citation time). sha256 f709f7096c0616d2…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0144 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.
ace