Pulmonary Artery-to-Vein Volume Difference: A New Imaging Biomarker for Risk Stratification in Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Abstract: Rationale and objectives To propose a new imaging biomarker, the pulmonary artery-to-vein volume difference (PAVVD), and evaluate its efficacy in risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism (APE) compared with traditional computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) parameters, as well as the impact of chronic pulmonary disease (CPD). Materials and methods This retrospective study included 134 patients with APE (high/intermediate-high risk, n = 46; intermediate-low/low risk, n = 88) from April 2023 to Ma…
"Pulmonary embolism CTPA" by Aung Myat and Arif Ahsan is licensed under CC BY 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/.
Researchers retrospectively analyzed 134 acute pulmonary embolism cases from April 2023 to March 2024, using commercial AI software to automatically measure a new biomarker, pulmonary artery-to-vein volume difference, alongside traditional CTPA parameters to stratify high/intermediate-high versus lower risk.
By the August 2026 publication date, the AI-derived PAVVD showed the strongest discriminative performance and net clinical benefit in low-to-moderate risk thresholds, suggesting utility as a complement to existing CTPA measures for emergency triage, though findings remain confined to a single retrospective cohort without prospective validation.
- Retrospective study of 134 patients with APE from April 2023 to March 2024 compared PAVVD against traditional CTPA parameters.
- Commercial AI software automatically quantified PAVVD, clot volume, and Qanadli score for analysis.
- Decision curve analysis showed PAVVD yielded highest net benefit in low-to-moderate threshold probability range for emergency triage.
Automated AI quantification of pulmonary artery-to-vein volume difference achieved the highest discrimination for high/intermediate-high risk acute pulmonary embolism with low missed-diagnosis risk.
The rundown
The study evaluated 134 APE patients split into high/intermediate-high risk (n=46) and intermediate-low/low risk (n=88) using commercial AI to quantify PAVVD and traditional CTPA metrics, comparing performance via AUC, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, NLR, and decision curve analysis.
Results reported PAVVD AUC 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.95), NPV 0.94 and NLR 0.13 indicating lowest missed diagnosis risk, with a noted crossover effect versus clot volume related to Qanadli score and multivariate regression to assess influence of chronic pulmonary disease.
Sources
- Peer-reviewedAcademic Radiology2026-08-25
How should this claim be treated?
ace
The debate