Problem Space a ranking of the record

TheProblems surrounding AI

25 problems match this view. 48% rest on at least one peer-reviewed study, and 4% clear the high-evidence bar. The latest was filed Sep 13, 2026.

Every problem in this view, one square each, shaded by the strength of its evidence. High 1 Moderate 24 Emerging 0
25 results
Show filters and sorting
Reset all

Matching records · page 1 of 1

1
Evidence-backed problemPeer-reviewedLabor

AI-enabled offensive techniques increase cybersecurity risk in Asia-Pacific by using data poisoning, model extraction and AI-driven social engineering, with agentic AI expanding attack surfaces

Source article: Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence in the Asia Pacific: Threats Defenses and Governance Recommendations

Discover Applied Sciences · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

2
Evidence-backed problemPeer-reviewedLabor

AI exposure concentrates in cognitively intense occupational clusters, creating multi-dimensional vulnerability that varies with job structure and buffering capacity.

Source article: Occupational Vulnerability to AI-Driven Change: The Role of Skill Composition, Task Structure, and Psychosocial Buffers

American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

3
Evidence-backed problemPeer-reviewedLabor

Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive artificial intelligence frameworks capable of automating the entire meta-analysis workflow, including literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment.

Source article: Unmasking bias in the evidence ecosystem: a panoramic analysis of 311,751 meta-analyses using an artificial intelligence agent-based approach

Journal of Global Health
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

6
Evidence-backed problemPeer-reviewedLabor

AI use in recruitment and hiring creates a heightened risk of concealing and reproducing organizational inequalities through algorithmic invisibility and growing legitimacy of AI solutions.

Source article: Problematizing the role of artificial intelligence in hiring and organizational inequalities: A multidisciplinary review

Human Relations
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

8
Evidence-backed problemPeer-reviewedLabor

Generative art systems accelerate inequities in visual arts by appropriating intellectual property from marginalised artists and reinforcing Eurocentric and gendered commodification.

Source article: Garbage in, garbage out? How the monster of AI art reflects human fault, bias, and capitalism in contemporary culture

AI & SOCIETY
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

10
Evidence-backed problemPeer-reviewedLabor

AI-driven automation that substitutes for routine tasks reduces demand and wages for low-skilled workers, causing absolute welfare losses for workers below a critical ability threshold and widening income inequality.

Source article: Skill-biased technological change in the age of AI: a theoretical analysis of automation and inequality

Economics of Innovation and New Technology
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

11
Evidence-backed problemPeer-reviewedLabor

The same vision treats human professional expertise as an extractable resource whose value is judged relative to AI, with potential to transform and revalue expert careers.

Source article: Cheap Expertise: Mapping and Challenging Industry Perspectives in the Expert Data Gig Economy

Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

19
Evidence-backed problemJournalismLabor

AI development depends on low-wage human labor in mines, factories and labelling centres, perpetuates pre-existing biases in recruitment and law enforcement, and is rolling out without public consent or consideration for planetary health while concentrating power in a handful of executives.

Source article: What If We Got AI Right? by Eleanor Drage review – avoiding apocalypse

The Guardian
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?