Moderate evidence
More
Hotel staff managed by AI half as likely to show initiative, experiments with 328 workers find
Study title: When AI supervises humans: how AI management triggers self-objectification and undermines proactive behavior
- Evidence type
- Controlled or validated comparison
- Sample
- n = 328
- Sources
- 1 sourcePeer-reviewed
- Published
- 2 min read
- Truvace record
- TRV-2026-2547cite or check it
Study title: When AI supervises humans: how AI management triggers self-objectification and undermines proactive behavior
Two scenario-based experiments with 328 hotel employees compared AI management with human management. Employees under AI management showed more self-objectification, meaning they were more prone to seeing themselves as objects. Logistic regression showed they were only half as likely to engage in proactive work behavior as those managed by humans.
Read the study abstract
Purpose The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into daily operations and management has become increasingly prevalent within the hospitality industry. However, the impact of transitioning managerial roles from humans to AI on hotel employees’ cognition and work behavior remains an unresolved issue. This paper aims to examine the relationship between AI management and proactive work behavior by identifying self-objectification as a mediator and AI identity as a moderator. Design/methodology/approach This…
The problem
In two scenario experiments with 328 hotel employees, those managed by AI were only half as likely to engage in proactive work behavior as those managed by humans.
In brief
The result matters for hotels moving managerial tasks from people to AI. The study treats self-objectification as the mechanism linking AI supervision to less initiative, which suggests the effect runs through how workers see themselves rather than through task design alone.
Employees with a strong AI identity were less susceptible to self-objectification. The authors recommend AI identity training and employee development programs, though the evidence comes from hypothetical scenarios rather than workplaces that actually use AI managers.
Main points
- The research combined two scenario-based experiments involving 328 hotel employees in total.
- Study 1 found AI management, compared with human management, positively predicted self-objectification among employees.
- Employees with a strong AI identity were less susceptible to self-objectification under AI management.
- Study 2 corroborated Study 1 and found self-objectification mediated the link between AI management and proactive work behavior.
- Logistic regression showed employees managed by AI were only half as likely to engage in proactive work behavior as those managed by humans.
- The authors recommend that hotels run AI identity training and employee development programs.
The full story
The study addresses the hospitality industry, where AI is increasingly used in daily operations and management. The authors say the effect of shifting managerial roles from humans to AI on hotel employees' cognition and work behavior had been unresolved. They used self-determination theory to frame the question.
Study 1 found that AI management, compared with human management, positively predicted self-objectification. AI identity moderated this effect: employees with a strong AI identity were less susceptible to self-objectification.
Study 2 replicated the Study 1 findings and showed self-objectification mediating the relationship between AI management and proactive work behavior. Logistic regression put the effect at half the likelihood of proactive behavior for employees managed by AI. The authors say hotels should build environments where employees feel empowered and valued, using AI identity training and development programs.
Sources
1 on file- International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Managementdoi:10.1108/ijchm-11-2025-1679
Talk it over
Who carries this cost, and what would have to change to prevent it?
Hotel staff managed by AI half as likely to show initiative, experiments with 328 workers findhttps://truvace.com/item/when-ai-supervises-humans-how-ai-management-triggers-self-objectification-and-un
Who carries this cost, and what would have to change to prevent it?
The problem In two scenario experiments with 328 hotel employees, those managed by AI were only half as likely to engage in proactive work behavior as those managed by humans.
Answer in the threadHow do we know? What can this kind of evidence show, and what can’t it?
The evidence This rests on a controlled comparison with a sample of 328, from International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
Answer in the threadWhat does it leave open? What else would you want to know before acting on it?
The record’s own caveat The findings come from two scenario-based experiments rather than observation of hotel employees working under real AI managers.
Answer in the threadHave you seen AI used this way where you study, work or live? Did it go the same way?
Answer in the thread
The questions are the same on every record. The details under them are taken from this record as written.
ace
What readers say