TRV-2026-2425Version 1 · Published

Saved · see the current record

Why this version exists

Certified into the record

The exact text we saved

This is the version exactly as it was saved, character for character. The SHA-256 hash below is a 64-character code worked out from that text. Run the same text through SHA-256 and you get the same code; change a single letter and the code comes out completely different. Each version also stores the previous version’s hash, which chains them together so no version can be swapped out quietly.

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-2425
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-11-08T06:01:51.616365Z
status: published
lens: g_space
sector: health
headline: Housing insecurity and cancer in South Australia: artificial intelligence-enabled insights from a statewide cancer support service
dek: Objective: This study demonstrates the use of a locally hosted, offline artificial intelligence approach to identify, quantify, and describe housing-related needs documented in routine case notes from a statewide cancer support service.
Methods: In this retrospective, exploratory service evaluation, a locally hosted, offline large language model screened 25,031 staff-generated case notes recorded between December 2020 and December 2025 for housing-related interactions and grouped confirmed interactions into cate…
gain_title: In a retrospective evaluation, a locally hosted offline AI model screened 25,031 cancer support case notes and, after reviewer checks, identified 308 housing-related interactions that were otherwise buried in routine records.
problem_title: (none)
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: In a retrospective evaluation, a locally hosted offline AI model screened 25,031 cancer support case notes and, after reviewer checks, identified 308 housing-related interactions that were otherwise buried in routine records.
gain_evidence: a locally hosted, offline large language model screened 25,031 staff-generated case notes | 308 (1.23%) were confirmed as housing-related interactions
problem_reading: (none)
problem_evidence: (none)
quick_read: A South Australian study used a locally hosted, offline large language model to read 25,031 case notes written by staff at a statewide cancer support service between December 2020 and December 2025. Of those interactions, 308 (1.23%) were confirmed as housing-related after at least two reviewers checked the flagged records.

The confirmed cases showed what housing trouble looked like for people with cancer. Lack of support from health and social services appeared in 44.16% of them, financial barriers to housing stability in 37.66%, and homelessness or reliance on emergency or crisis housing in 36.04%.

In more than half of the confirmed interactions, housing was not the reason the person first got in touch and came up only during conversation. The authors say the findings fit existing evidence for linking cancer, social and housing services, and for giving housing more policy recognition in cancer care.
limitation: The findings come from a single cancer support service, and the study was a retrospective, exploratory evaluation with descriptive results only.
tag: Evidence-backed gain
key_points: The model screened 25,031 staff-generated case notes recorded from December 2020 to December 2025. | 308 interactions (1.23%) were confirmed as housing-related. | Lack of support from health and social services was the most common category, at 44.16%. | Financial barriers to housing stability appeared in 37.66% of confirmed interactions. | Homelessness or reliance on emergency or crisis housing appeared in 36.04%. | In more than half of confirmed interactions, housing emerged only during discussion rather than as the initial reason for contact. | At least two reviewers independently verified flagged records and their categorisation.
rundown: The work was a retrospective, exploratory service evaluation of routine case notes from a statewide cancer support service in South Australia. A locally hosted model running offline screened the notes for housing-related interactions, which keeps sensitive health information on local systems.

Confirmed interactions were sorted into categories using a predefined framework, and flagged records and categorisations were independently verified by at least two reviewers. Results were summarised descriptively.

Because housing often surfaced only during conversation rather than as the reason for contact, the authors say routine service data can reveal needs that people do not initially raise. They link this to coordinated pathways between oncology, social and housing services.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | Australian Health Review | https://doi.org/10.1071/ah26136 | 2026-12-03
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
SHA-256 hash
7f561416785d00e209c94966395e2b7ac99daa9b221550f7bc94623f13d779e6
Previous version’s hash
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2425 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.