TRV-2026-2378Published recordPeer-reviewed

Generative artificial intelligence and the development of English oral skills: perceptions of pre-service English language teachers

This study explored the perceptions of future English teachers regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence [GAI], using ChatGPT and Gemini Flash as tools to support the development of oral English skills. The objective was to document and analyze the students’ experiences with an interaction that incorporated guided conversations, role-playing, and pronunciation training. An exploratory-descriptive qualitative approach was adopted, involving 21 B1-level students from the Escuela Normal de Atla…

Education · The Trace (a gain and a problem) · first published 2026-11-05 · v2 · read the full story · raw data (JSON)

The gain

Interviewed trainee English teachers at one Mexican teacher college said ChatGPT and Gemini Flash gave them instant, personalised feedback and let them practise speaking nearly every day on their phones instead of only in class.

The problem

Interviewed trainee English teachers at one Mexican teacher college said unequal device capabilities and weak home internet limited use, and that chatbot conversation felt flat, formal and unlike how native speakers actually talk.

What this doesn’t fix

The study is a small qualitative sample from one college based on self-reported perceptions, and the authors say it has limitations that make findings difficult to generalise and that no before and after measures of oral expression were used.

Sources

Your take

What do you make of this one?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2378, v2: “Generative artificial intelligence and the development of English oral skills: perceptions of pre-service English language teachers.” Truvace, 2026-11-05. /record/TRV-2026-2378 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 cd323ca153453831…

Change history

Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why.

  1. Revisedv2cd323ca15345…

    Voice pass: plainer wording and study attribution; no facts or figures changed.

  2. Publishedv18d230f2c3648…

    Certified into the record

Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2378 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.