TRV-2026-2376Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Bridging technology and pedagogy: a cross-sectional analysis of AI use, self-reported academic effects, and ethical concerns among students across diverse health science curricula

Abstract Background Artificial Intelligence has emerged as a transformative force in health professions education, yet its impact on academic success and students' ethical concerns remains underexplored. This study evaluates AI utilization patterns and their perceived effects on learning outcomes among health science students. Methods Using a stratified two-stage cluster sampling design, data were collected from 310 students across various health-related programs via interviewer-administered questionnaires. Resu…

Education · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-11-05 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

Health science students at the University of Bisha rated AI as improving their study efficiency (3.70/5) and understanding of complex topics (3.90/5), and 54.2% said it improved their grades.

Current reading — problem

Although 90% of 310 surveyed health science students used ChatGPT, 82.6% had received no formal AI instruction and 61% voiced ethical concerns, leaving them exposed to automation bias.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2376, v1: “Bridging technology and pedagogy: a cross-sectional analysis of AI use, self-reported academic effects, and ethical concerns among students across diverse health science curricula.” Truvace, 2026-11-05. /record/TRV-2026-2376 (accessed at citation time). sha256 ca1e1bb22e024150…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv1ca1e1bb22e02…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2376 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.