aceENGLISH EDUCATION STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF USING AI TOOLS IN ACADEMIC WRITING: A CASE STUDY
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly altered academic writing practices in higher education, yet its pedagogical implications for pre-service English teachers remain underexplored. This qualitative case study aimed to investigate English Education students' perceptions of utilizing AI tools in academic writing, specifically examining perceived benefits, operational challenges, and academic integrity negotiations. Ten undergraduate students, comprising eight eighth-semester…
Ten Indonesian English Education students used AI tools for brainstorming, outlining, and grammatical refinement in their academic writing.
The same students ran into fabricated citations and stylistic rigidity from AI tools, and feared losing their independent critical thinking.
The study is a qualitative case study of only ten purposively recruited students at one institution, so findings reflect self-reported perceptions and cannot be generalized.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedLANGUAGE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra2026-11-03
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2358, v1: “ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF USING AI TOOLS IN ACADEMIC WRITING: A CASE STUDY.” Truvace, 2026-11-04. /record/TRV-2026-2358 (accessed at citation time). sha256 3efa575f143a67a2…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2358 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.