TRV-2026-2353Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Development and Validation of a ChatGPT-Based Assessment for Conversation-Related Clinical Skills in Occupational Therapy OSCEs

ImportanceConversation-related clinical skills are central to Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) in occupational therapy. However, real-time examiner scoring is resource-intensive and may overlook students' specific skills. Transcript-based scoring with Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) may address these limitations.ObjectiveTo develop a ChatGPT-based assessment for chief-complaint interview OSCEs (G-ACE) and examine criterion validity against expert-consensus ratings, test-retest…

Health · Good Space — documented gain · certified 2026-11-03 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

A ChatGPT-based tool scored student interview transcripts with acceptable repeat-scoring reliability and small absolute differences from expert ratings on domain and total scores, offering an alternative to resource-intensive real-time examiner scoring.

What this doesn’t fix

Some items showed lower consistency with expert ratings, and the rehabilitation expectations domain had weak inter-rater reliability, so formative feedback should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2353, v1: “Development and Validation of a ChatGPT-Based Assessment for Conversation-Related Clinical Skills in Occupational Therapy OSCEs.” Truvace, 2026-11-03. /record/TRV-2026-2353 (accessed at citation time). sha256 85c88c962fde803a…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv185c88c962fde…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2353 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.