aceIs There Fairness in AI?
Abstract As predictive artificial intelligence (AI) technologies increasingly steer workplace decisions, debates around fairness have intensified. Existing research often approaches fairness either as a set of universal principles supported or undermined by algorithms, or as a product of social interpretations, thereby providing either technologically deterministic or purely social accounts. Drawing on an ethnographic study of a human resources (HR) department of a large international company that introduced AI…
After an international company introduced AI in hiring, HR's own version of fairness displaced the fairness practices of other experts, narrowing who defined fair hiring.
The findings come from an ethnographic study of a single HR department at one large international company, so the abstract does not show that the pattern holds elsewhere.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedJournal of Management Studies2025-08-24
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2307, v1: “Is There Fairness in AI?.” Truvace, 2026-10-29. /record/TRV-2026-2307 (accessed at citation time). sha256 89d9057e9fb2ee04…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2307 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.