aceAI AND COPYRIGHT: FROM A DOCTRINAL CRISIS TO A HYBRID MODEL OF COLLECTIVE LICENSING
The explosive development of generative artificial intelligence (hereinafter – AI) has triggered a fundamental crisis within intellectual property law. A central conflict has emerged between artificial intelligence developers, who require access to vast datasets for model training, and rights holders, who seek to protect their works and receive fair compensation for their use. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the inadequacy of existing legal doctrines in addressing the use of copyrighted data for tr…
Existing US fair use litigation and the EU TDM opt-out are argued to leave AI training on copyrighted works legally unstable and unable to deliver meaningful compensation to creators.
The collective licensing model is the author's proposed hypothesis, and the abstract provides no evidence of implementation or measured outcomes.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedLegal Horizons2025-08-29
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2248, v1: “AI AND COPYRIGHT: FROM A DOCTRINAL CRISIS TO A HYBRID MODEL OF COLLECTIVE LICENSING.” Truvace, 2026-10-25. /record/TRV-2026-2248 (accessed at citation time). sha256 9d348750b09ce71f…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2248 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.