TRV-2026-2243Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Can large language models code meaning-making? A multi-model validation of automated autobiographical reasoning scoring in Chinese adolescent narratives

Autobiographical reasoning (AR) involves drawing self-relevant meaning from personal experiences. It is central to narrative identity research, but manual coding requires substantial time and trained coders. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for automating other narrative coding tasks, but their capacity for meaning-making judgments that may depend on implicit event-self connections remains untested. We collected autobiographical narratives from 437 Chinese high school students and evaluated three…

Science · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-10-24 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

In texts with moderate-to-high autobiographical reasoning, majority-vote LLM scoring reached 94.4% accuracy, suggesting partial usefulness for automated coding.

Current reading — problem

Agreement with manual coding was only moderate at best (Cohen's kappa .416), and models missed low-AR texts and over-read emotional expression, so they cannot replace formal manual coding.

What this doesn’t fix

The conclusion applies only to the specific models, prompts, corpus and scoring rules tested, so it may not generalize to other models, languages, or datasets.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2243, v1: “Can large language models code meaning-making? A multi-model validation of automated autobiographical reasoning scoring in Chinese adolescent narratives.” Truvace, 2026-10-24. /record/TRV-2026-2243 (accessed at citation time). sha256 75b43761abf9d4ac…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv175b43761abf9…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2243 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.