TRV-2026-2206Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Within-person reciprocal processes between AI feedback literacy and agentic engagement: a three-wave random-intercept cross-lagged panel study

Artificial intelligence (AI) feedback has become a pervasive feature of university learning, yet whether students’ capacity to engage productively with such feedback co-develops with their broader learner agency remains poorly understood. Drawing on student feedback literacy theory, self-determination theory as a supplementary motivational lens, and the mutualism principle, this study tested whether AI feedback literacy and agentic engagement reciprocally predict each other over time at the within-person level a…

Education · Good Space — documented gain · certified 2026-10-23 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

Among Chinese undergraduates, higher AI feedback literacy at one point predicted later increases in agentic engagement, and agentic engagement likewise predicted later gains in AI feedback literacy, indicating a mutually reinforcing development.

What this doesn’t fix

The cultural interpretation is presented only as a possibility, and the sample covers Chinese undergraduates over a single semester, with some participants lost to incomplete data, so generalization is untested.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2206, v1: “Within-person reciprocal processes between AI feedback literacy and agentic engagement: a three-wave random-intercept cross-lagged panel study.” Truvace, 2026-10-23. /record/TRV-2026-2206 (accessed at citation time). sha256 d82db3f72ddc2ff1…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv1d82db3f72ddc…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2206 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.