aceLos riesgos de la IA dialógica en la educación superior: afectaciones cognitivas y en la capacidad de lecto-escritura
Dialogic Artificial Intelligence (DAI) or communicative AI within Large Language Models (LLMs) is rapidly expanding across higher education and academic workflows in both teaching and research. The adoption of DAI is being driven by the pressure to enhance productivity and automate academic practices. This paper discusses the primary risks that the intensive use of DAI poses to human cognitive capacities, information biases, and the erosion of literacy, critical thinking, argumentation, and academic discourse sk…
Heavy use of conversational AI in university teaching and research may weaken students' and scholars' cognition, reading and writing, argumentation skills, and blur authorship and plagiarism boundaries.
The source frames the transformation as something DAI 'could' cause, so the cognitive and literacy harms are possibilities discussed conceptually rather than measured outcomes.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedSCIO: Revista de Filosofía2026-10-20
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2145, v1: “Los riesgos de la IA dialógica en la educación superior: afectaciones cognitivas y en la capacidad de lecto-escritura.” Truvace, 2026-10-22. /record/TRV-2026-2145 (accessed at citation time). sha256 83e58f1435804b8f…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2145 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.