TRV-2026-2135Version 1 · Certified

Written 2026-10-21 22:04:07 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Certified into the record

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-2135
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-10-21T22:04:07.943469Z
status: published
lens: p_space
sector: business
headline: Effect of AI authorship disclosure on purchase intention in cultural tourism souvenirs: The mediating roles of perceived effort and authenticity
dek: As generative artificial intelligence (AI) expands in cultural tourism souvenir design and disclosure policies evolve, evidence remains limited on how AI authorship disclosure shapes responses across nationality groups and products. Drawing on signaling theory, two studies compared consumers from China and the U.S. across three disclosure conditions: unlabeled, human–AI co-created, and AI-generated. Study 1 used tourism postcard stimuli ( N = 1110), and Study 2 used mug and tourism tote bag stimuli ( N = 1255).…
gain_title: (none)
problem_title: Telling consumers that souvenirs are AI-generated reduced purchase intention relative to no disclosure, with the drop significant among U.S. participants but not Chinese participants.
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: (none)
gain_evidence: (none)
problem_reading: Telling consumers that souvenirs are AI-generated reduced purchase intention relative to no disclosure, with the drop significant among U.S. participants but not Chinese participants.
problem_evidence: AI-generated disclosure was consistently associated with lower purchase intention than no disclosure | Differences across disclosure conditions were significant among participants from the U.S. but not among those from China.
quick_read: Two experiments compared consumers from China and the U.S. who saw cultural tourism souvenirs labeled in one of three ways: unlabeled, human-AI co-created, or AI-generated. Study 1 used postcards and Study 2 used mugs and tote bags, with more than 2,300 participants in total.

The results suggest that revealing AI involvement can cost sellers sales, and that the effect depends on market and product. It remains unclear how far the findings extend beyond the products and two nationalities tested, and the human-AI co-creation label did not reliably help.
limitation: Results varied between studies and products, notably for human-AI co-created disclosure, and nationality moderated only some indirect effects, so findings may not generalize across products and national markets.
tag: Evidence-backed problem
key_points: Disclosure affected purchase intention and interacted significantly with nationality in both studies. | AI-generated labels consistently produced lower purchase intention than no label. | Human-AI co-created labels performed differently across the two studies. | Perceived effort and perceived authenticity mediated the disclosure effects. | Nationality moderated some, but not all, of the indirect effects.
rundown: The study drew on signaling theory and tested three disclosure conditions. Study 1 (N = 1110) used tourism postcards, while Study 2 (N = 1255) used mug and tourism tote bag stimuli.

In Study 1, unlabeled and human-AI co-created conditions did not differ and both exceeded the AI-generated condition. In Study 2, the unlabeled condition exceeded both disclosed conditions for both products, and the two disclosed conditions did not differ.

Parallel mediation analyses found indirect effects through perceived effort and perceived authenticity. The human-AI co-created versus unlabeled authenticity effect was nonsignificant in Study 1 but significant in Study 2. The authors advise firms not to assume co-creation helps, to clarify the human contribution, and to pretest disclosure strategies by product and market.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.105180 | 2026-10-20
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sha256
b00366b1081ef5660983788916ea11b1bcf545ac4dbeb15f3eb2653761529cf4
previous
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2135 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.