TRV-2026-2092Certified recordPeer-reviewed

ChatGPT as a Supporting Medium for Islamic Religious Education: Strengthening Students’ Learning Experience and Academic Integrity

The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, offers opportunities to enhance learning while raising concerns about academic integrity. This study examines the role of ChatGPT in Islamic Religious Education (IRE) and formulates strategies to preserve students’ academic integrity. Using a qualitative library research approach, it analyzes scientific articles, books, policy documents, and other credible sources on generative AI, IRE, learning autonomy, and academic integrity…

Education · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-10-21 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

In Islamic Religious Education, ChatGPT can widen access to learning resources, support independent study, clarify complex concepts, and give preliminary feedback.

Current reading — problem

Excessive reliance on ChatGPT in Islamic Religious Education may encourage plagiarism, weaken critical thinking, reduce originality, and yield inaccurate information.

What this doesn’t fix

The framework is a conceptual synthesis of existing literature and has not been empirically validated, so its effectiveness in classrooms remains untested.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2092, v1: “ChatGPT as a Supporting Medium for Islamic Religious Education: Strengthening Students’ Learning Experience and Academic Integrity.” Truvace, 2026-10-21. /record/TRV-2026-2092 (accessed at citation time). sha256 6f5afb5ba89b4d16…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv16f5afb5ba89b…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2092 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.