aceMore human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias
Abstract We investigate the political bias of a large language model (LLM), ChatGPT, which has become popular for retrieving factual information and generating content. Although ChatGPT assures that it is impartial, the literature suggests that LLMs exhibit bias involving race, gender, religion, and political orientation. Political bias in LLMs can have adverse political and electoral consequences similar to bias from traditional and social media. Moreover, political bias can be harder to detect and eradicate th…
Repeated, randomized testing found ChatGPT's default answers lean toward the Democrats in the US, Lula in Brazil and the Labour Party in the UK, raising concerns about electoral and political influence.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedPublic Choice2023-08-16
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2022, v1: “More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias.” Truvace, 2026-10-20. /record/TRV-2026-2022 (accessed at citation time). sha256 8bdbc9c5ed8b55a4…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2022 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.