TRV-2026-2016Version 1 · Certified

Written 2026-10-20 10:43:23 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Certified into the record

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-2016
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-10-20T10:43:23.049465Z
status: published
lens: p_space
sector: health
headline: Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Machine Learning for Exploratory Classification of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Young Children
dek: Early identification of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may facilitate timely intervention, while diagnosis remains clinically based. This exploratory study evaluated fNIRS-derived features using multiple machine-learning algorithms to compare observed classification performance between young children aged 2-6 years with ASD and typically developing (TD) children. β-activation values from eight channels were used as features to differentiate the ASD and TD groups. Two paradigm-specific analytic datasets were anal…
gain_title: (none)
problem_title: Seven machine-learning classifiers applied to fNIRS features from children aged 2-6 did not significantly exceed chance in permutation tests, so no diagnostic value beyond age and sex was established.
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: (none)
gain_evidence: (none)
problem_reading: Seven machine-learning classifiers applied to fNIRS features from children aged 2-6 did not significantly exceed chance in permutation tests, so no diagnostic value beyond age and sex was established.
problem_evidence: none of the evaluated classifiers demonstrated statistically significant above-chance performance in the permutation tests | independent diagnostic value beyond age and sex was not established
quick_read: Researchers tested whether task-based functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals could help machine-learning models separate children with autism spectrum disorder from typically developing peers aged 2-6. They used beta-activation values from eight channels across two task paradigms with about 60 children each, and compared seven common classifiers using leave-one-out cross-validation and permutation testing.

The result matters because autism diagnosis remains clinically based and earlier identification could allow timely intervention, yet this approach did not yet deliver a usable aid. The work shows the data can be collected and analyzed in practice, but whether fNIRS-based models can add diagnostic value remains unresolved pending larger, sex-balanced external validation.
limitation: The authors state that diagnostic value was not established and needs validation in larger, sex-balanced external cohorts; the samples were small, with roughly 60 children per paradigm.
tag: Evidence-backed problem
key_points: Paradigm 1 included 60 children (29 with ASD, 31 typically developing) with 24 beta features each; Paradigm 2 included 58 children with 16 features each. | In Paradigm 1, K-nearest neighbors had the highest observed accuracy (0.567) and decision tree the highest observed AUC (0.582). | Paradigm 2 showed numerically higher performance on several metrics, but no classifier significantly exceeded chance. | The fNIRS features added no statistically significant predictive value beyond age and sex.
rundown: The study compared K-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting decision trees, and XGBoost. Performance was judged by accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and AUC, with normalization and principal component analysis used for feature extraction.

Permutation testing checked whether observed performance beat what chance would produce. Even the best Paradigm 1 figures were modest, and the authors describe the work as exploratory, supporting only the procedural feasibility of acquiring and analyzing task-based fNIRS data.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | Journal of Visualized Experiments | https://doi.org/10.3791/72520 | 2026-10-13
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sha256
bd0f1f11fc416f6a029665007ec720c27716db593280a6f918928f6b04a922b7
previous
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2016 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.