TRV-2026-1949Certified recordPeer-reviewed

A Retrospective Benchmark of Quantitative Antimicrobial Peptide Activity Prediction Tools

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are critical candidates for addressing the global antibiotic resistance crisis. AI-driven quantitative models capable of directly predicting peptide antimicrobial activity, specifically minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), are gaining scientific prominence by providing precise guidance for the rational design of AMPs. To assess their real-world, out-of-the-box performance, we conducted a retrospective benchmark of 10 publicly released quantitative AMP prediction tools spanning cl…

Science · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-10-19 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

Selected tools kept useful relative-ranking and virtual-screening enrichment ability, so they can work as early-stage filters when screening peptide candidates.

Current reading — problem

Most publicly released tools gave poor absolute MIC predictions and transferred badly to an external dataset, so they cannot replace experimental measurement.

What this doesn’t fix

The tools were assessed retrospectively, and most showed limited transferability to the external benchmark, so their predictions cannot stand in for experimental MIC measurements.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1949, v1: “A Retrospective Benchmark of Quantitative Antimicrobial Peptide Activity Prediction Tools.” Truvace, 2026-10-19. /record/TRV-2026-1949 (accessed at citation time). sha256 67248c584d42c029…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv167248c584d42…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1949 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.