aceEffectiveness of Generative AI-Enabled Teaching for Clinical Reasoning in Health Care Education: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Clinical reasoning skills are key competencies required by health care professionals. Generative AI (GenAI)-enabled teaching may be able to offer personalized learning; however, its effectiveness compared with traditional teaching methods for developing clinical reasoning capabilities remains underexplored. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate, synthesize, and compare the evidence on effectiveness in clinical reasoning capabilities between GenAI-enabled teaching and tradi…
Health care education is adopting generative AI teaching methods faster than evidence shows they build clinical reasoning better than traditional teaching.
This is a protocol without pooled effectiveness findings, and the authors note that studies may be too diverse to combine statistically.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedJMIR Research Protocols2026-10-15
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1554, v1: “Effectiveness of Generative AI-Enabled Teaching for Clinical Reasoning in Health Care Education: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Truvace, 2026-10-16. /record/TRV-2026-1554 (accessed at citation time). sha256 e28e1ea4083c0630…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1554 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.