aceClinician Use of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Information Platform
Importance: Despite growing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, empirical evidence on how clinicians use these tools is limited. Objective: To characterize clinician use of an AI-enabled clinical information platform, the distribution of use across the clinical workforce, and the purpose of submitted queries. Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed clinicians with National Provider Identifier-verified accounts of a commonly used AI-enabled clinical info…
Clinicians adopted an AI clinical information platform at scale, with monthly active users rising from 355 to 703,265 and heavy use for treatment and management questions.
The study measures how clinicians use the platform, not whether the use was accurate or improved patient care, and the topic classification relied on a sample of queries labeled by a large language model.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedJAMA2026-10-15
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1544, v1: “Clinician Use of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Information Platform.” Truvace, 2026-10-16. /record/TRV-2026-1544 (accessed at citation time). sha256 0f625187223ca549…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1544 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.