TRV-2026-1460Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Informed forecasting: Leveraging auxiliary knowledge to boost large language model performance on time series forecasting

The rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) has sparked growing interest in extending their capabilities beyond traditional natural language tasks, including applications in time series forecasting. This work explores the enhancement of time series forecasting with LLMs by incorporating time-dependent covariates. We propose a set of representative prompting strategies that span a wide range of formats while incorporating covariates, and then implement the proposed framework to evaluate performance across…

Science · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-10-15 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

Including relevant time-dependent covariates in GPT-4o-mini prompts reduced prediction errors by up to 70% versus a no-covariate baseline across three real-world datasets.

Current reading — problem

Poorly aligned choices of covariate and prompt structure can degrade forecasting performance rather than improve it.

What this doesn’t fix

The improvements depend on selecting well-aligned covariates and prompt structures, since poorly aligned configurations can reduce accuracy.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1460, v1: “Informed forecasting: Leveraging auxiliary knowledge to boost large language model performance on time series forecasting.” Truvace, 2026-10-15. /record/TRV-2026-1460 (accessed at citation time). sha256 05cb318c13aa9c1b…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv105cb318c13aa…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1460 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.