aceAttitudes and Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scientific Process of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine Research: A Large-Scale, International Cross-Sectional Survey
Background Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots have shown utility in assisting with various research tasks. Traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) is a patient-centric approach that emphasizes holistic well-being. The integration of TCIM and GenAI presents numerous key opportunities. However, TCIM researchers' attitudes toward GenAI tools remain less understood. This large-scale, international cross-sectional survey aimed to elucidate the attitudes and perceptions of TCIM res…
Survey respondents most often named bias, errors and limitations as the main challenges of using AI chatbots in research, though the record gives no figure for this.
Sources
- Peer-reviewedJournal of Evidence-Based Medicine2026-09-22
What do you make of this one?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1174, v2: “Attitudes and Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scientific Process of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine Research: A Large-Scale, International Cross-Sectional Survey.” Truvace, 2026-11-04. /record/TRV-2026-1174 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 7443848366921a9a…
Change history
Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why.
Editorial pass: sharper headline; gain/problem restated as concrete outcomes.
Certified into the record
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1174 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.