TRV-2026-1167Version 2 · Revised

Saved · see the current record

Why this version exists

Direction audit: the problem line described the method, not an outcome; restated as the finding.

The exact text we saved

This is the version exactly as it was saved, character for character. The SHA-256 hash below is a 64-character code worked out from that text. Run the same text through SHA-256 and you get the same code; change a single letter and the code comes out completely different. Each version also stores the previous version’s hash, which chains them together so no version can be swapped out quietly.

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-1167
version: 2
kind: revised
reason: Direction audit: the problem line described the method, not an outcome; restated as the finding.
timestamp: 2026-10-26T06:38:40.505346Z
status: published
lens: g_space
sector: crime
headline: Radial wall strain for residual risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention
dek: Background Percutaneous coronary intervention effectively treats flow-limiting stenoses; however, untreated non-target vessels with vulnerable plaques remain a major contributor to future adverse cardiovascular events. Plaque strain is a promising marker of plaque vulnerability but traditionally requires complex modelling and expensive intracoronary imaging. We developed a novel artificial intelligence algorithm for subpixel-level lumen delineation, enabling real-time automated assessment of radial wall strain (…
gain_title: An AI algorithm enables real-time automated radial wall strain assessment from routine angiography, avoiding complex modelling and costly intracoronary imaging, to flag vulnerable plaques.
problem_title: (none)
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: An AI algorithm enables real-time automated radial wall strain assessment from routine angiography, avoiding complex modelling and costly intracoronary imaging, to flag vulnerable plaques.
gain_evidence: (none)
problem_reading: (none)
problem_evidence: (none)
quick_read: Background Percutaneous coronary intervention effectively treats flow-limiting stenoses; however, untreated non-target vessels with vulnerable plaques remain a major contributor to future adverse cardiovascular events. Plaque strain is a promising marker of plaque vulnerability but traditionally requires complex modelling and expensive intracoronary imaging.

We developed a novel artificial intelligence algorithm for subpixel-level lumen delineation, enabling real-time automated assessment of radial wall strain (RWS) from routine angiography. A prespecified cutoff value of maximal RWS (RWS max ) ≥13% was used to define increased plaque vulnerability.
limitation: 
tag: Evidence-backed gain
key_points: Background Percutaneous coronary intervention effectively treats flow-limiting stenoses; however, untreated non-target vessels with vulnerable plaques remain a major contributor to future adverse cardiovascular events. | Plaque strain is a promising marker of plaque vulnerability but traditionally requires complex modelling and expensive intracoronary imaging. | We developed a novel artificial intelligence algorithm for subpixel-level lumen delineation, enabling real-time automated assessment of radial wall strain (RWS) from routine angiography.
rundown: Background Percutaneous coronary intervention effectively treats flow-limiting stenoses; however, untreated non-target vessels with vulnerable plaques remain a major contributor to future adverse cardiovascular events. Plaque strain is a promising marker of plaque vulnerability but traditionally requires complex modelling and expensive intracoronary imaging.

We developed a novel artificial intelligence algorithm for subpixel-level lumen delineation, enabling real-time automated assessment of radial wall strain (RWS) from routine angiography. Aims This post hoc study sought to determine the prognostic value of RWS for predicting future cardiac events in non-target vessels over 5 years, using the high-quality TARGET All Comers randomised trial.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | EuroIntervention | https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-26-00126 | 2026-09-21
prev: f92bcf28841f3dec319810442f031dc14901b23fbc18153de1c8a2f7c140485c
SHA-256 hash
974997dc5779126611617af5145db9edd94c312e386ffd113ff64ecc184f3b84
Previous version’s hash
f92bcf28841f3dec319810442f031dc14901b23fbc18153de1c8a2f7c140485c
Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1167 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.