TruaceTracing the truth around AISunday, September 20, 2026
TRV-2026-1149Version 1 · Certified

Written 2026-09-20 06:53:32 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Certified into the record

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-1149
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-09-20T06:53:32.779245Z
status: published
lens: p_space
sector: health
headline: Artificial Intelligence in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Imaging: A Study-Level Cross-Sectional Analysis of Validation Status and Clinical Applicability
dek: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) imaging, but the extent of validation and clinical applicability across the literature remains uncertain. We performed a study-level cross-sectional analysis using a frozen Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) cohort supplemented by PubMed and IEEE Xplore searches to assess database coverage and the stability of findings from the WoSCC cohort. After study-level reconciliation, 463 independent studies were included. White…
gain_title: (none)
problem_title: Artificial Intelligence in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Imaging: A Study-Level Cross-Sectional Analysis of Validation Status and Clinical Applicability: White matter hyperintensity segmentation/quantification was the most common task (196/463, 42.3%), followed by cerebral microbleed detection/classification (82/463, 17.7%), perivascular space/lacune assessment (67/463, 14.5%), CSVD burden/risk modeling (62/463, 13.4%), and clinical outcome prediction (56/463, 12.1%).
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: (none)
gain_evidence: (none)
problem_reading: Artificial Intelligence in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Imaging: A Study-Level Cross-Sectional Analysis of Validation Status and Clinical Applicability: White matter hyperintensity segmentation/quantification was the most common task (196/463, 42.3%), followed by cerebral microbleed detection/classification (82/463, 17.7%), perivascular space/lacune assessment (67/463, 14.5%), CSVD burden/risk modeling (62/463, 13.4%), and clinical outcome prediction (56/463, 12.1%).
problem_evidence: (none)
quick_read: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) imaging, but the extent of validation and clinical applicability across the literature remains uncertain. We performed a study-level cross-sectional analysis using a frozen Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) cohort supplemented by PubMed and IEEE Xplore searches to assess database coverage and the stability of findings from the WoSCC cohort.

White matter hyperintensity segmentation/quantification was the most common task (196/463, 42.3%), followed by cerebral microbleed detection/classification (82/463, 17.7%), perivascular space/lacune assessment (67/463, 14.5%), CSVD burden/risk modeling (62/463, 13.4%), and clinical outcome prediction (56/463, 12.1%). Deep learning was the largest model family (185/463, 40.0%).
limitation: 
tag: Evidence-backed problem
key_points: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) imaging, but the extent of validation and clinical applicability across the literature remains uncertain. | We performed a study-level cross-sectional analysis using a frozen Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) cohort supplemented by PubMed and IEEE Xplore searches to assess database coverage and the stability of findings from the WoSCC cohort. | After study-level reconciliation, 463 independent studies were included.
rundown: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) imaging, but the extent of validation and clinical applicability across the literature remains uncertain. We performed a study-level cross-sectional analysis using a frozen Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) cohort supplemented by PubMed and IEEE Xplore searches to assess database coverage and the stability of findings from the WoSCC cohort.

After study-level reconciliation, 463 independent studies were included. White matter hyperintensity segmentation/quantification was the most common task (196/463, 42.3%), followed by cerebral microbleed detection/classification (82/463, 17.7%), perivascular space/lacune assessment (67/463, 14.5%), CSVD burden/risk modeling (62/463, 13.4%), and clinical outcome prediction (56/463, 12.1%).
sources:
- peer_reviewed | Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-026-02327-x | 2026-09-18
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sha256
2ef54cf6b6f30e4df3ad66c3fafc69a12e461c9ab28c4225f6ecf01140f7c4ed
previous
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1149 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.