TruaceTracing the truth around AISaturday, September 12, 2026
TRV-2026-1033Version 1 · Certified

Written 2026-09-09 06:06:50 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Certified into the record

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-1033
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-09-09T06:06:50.648169Z
status: published
lens: g_space
sector: health
headline: A protocol for validation of novel artificial intelligence-based framework for dyspnoea investigation with cardiopulmonary exercise testing
dek: Background Exertional dyspnoea largely represents the sensory translation of an ever-growing dynamic mismatch between ventilatory demand and capacity as exercise intensifies. This fundamental tenet, however, has not been formally incorporated into data display and clinical interpretation of incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The objectives of the present study were to validate a novel framework (Dynamic Assessment of Dyspnoea and Ventilation on Exercise (DyVe-X)) to quantify the severity of exe…
gain_title: Protocol proposes AI-based DyVe-X software to continuously quantify exertional dyspnoea against work rate and ventilation and to identify excessive and constrained breathing patterns during incremental CPET, with anticipated superior performance over peak breathing reserve criterion.
problem_title: (none)
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: Protocol proposes AI-based DyVe-X software to continuously quantify exertional dyspnoea against work rate and ventilation and to identify excessive and constrained breathing patterns during incremental CPET, with anticipated superior performance over peak breathing reserve criterion.
gain_evidence: we anticipate a superior performance of DyVe-X in exposing dyspnoea-generating mechanical-ventilatory abnormalities across cohorts | uses an algorithm based on artificial intelligence techniques to establish the burden of 1) exertional dyspnoea versus work rate and ventilation
problem_reading: (none)
problem_evidence: (none)
quick_read: Published 2026-09-07 as a peer-reviewed protocol, the study outlines validation of Dynamic Assessment of Dyspnoea and Ventilation on Exercise (DyVe-X), an AI-based software that continuously assesses dyspnoea intensity and mechanical-ventilatory reserve depletion during incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 1161 tobacco-exposed subjects.

If validated, the framework could shift CPET interpretation from a single peak breathing reserve threshold to a dynamic, symptom-linked assessment of why breathlessness occurs, but as of the publication date no validation results are reported and performance remains an anticipated outcome limited to smokers and ex-smokers at risk for or with COPD.
limitation: Validation is limited to tobacco-exposed cohorts at risk for or with COPD, not a general dyspnoea population, and outcomes are presented as hypotheses rather than observed results.
tag: Evidence-backed gain
key_points: Study uses incremental CPET data from three large cohorts of tobacco-exposed subjects: smokers and ex-smokers at risk for, or at different stages of, COPD (n=1161). | DyVe-X 1.0.0 software categorizes breathing abnormalities as excessive breathing (low submaximal ventilatory reserve) and constrained breathing (reduced inspiratory reserve) based on dyspnoea-work rate and dyspnoea-ventilation relationships. | Comparator for validation is current key criterion of ventilatory limitation defined as peak breathing reserve 2415%.
rundown: The protocol describes DyVe-X 1.0.0 (Kingston, ON, Canada) which applies AI techniques to normative data to map dyspnoea intensity against work rate and ventilation across exercise, rather than relying only on peak values.

Authors define two mechanistic phenotypes to be tested: excessive breathing with low submaximal ventilatory reserve but preserved dyspnoea-ventilation, and constrained breathing with reduced inspiratory reserve and high dyspnoea-work rate and dyspnoea-ventilation.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | ERJ Open Research | https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00269-2026 | 2026-09-07
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sha256
36829714a930a296d243dd048d6bd940eb79ecde2035d2139d5583d503122d1b
previous
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1033 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.