± HEALTH In our modern society, digital devices, social media platforms, and artificial intelligence (AI) tools have b…+ CLIMATE The growing complexity of electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) operations—driven by grid constraints, ren…± HEALTH Objectives This study aim to develop, compare and internally validate machine-learning models for predicting…+ HEALTH Diabetes management faces a number of obstacles, such as fragmented healthcare data, privacy concerns, poor e…− SCIENCE Background Craniofacial soft tissue thickness (CFSTT) is a critical parameter in forensic facial reconstructi…+ HEALTH Background Technological innovation in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has largely focused on intraoperative p…± HEALTH Infective endocarditis (IE) continues to be an often fatal condition despite improvements in cardiac surgical…± HEALTH Purpose of review Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is the leading cause of d…
TruaceTracing the truth around AISaturday, September 12, 2026
Subscribe
TRV-2026-1012Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can be used to author academic texts at a similar level to what humans are capable of, causing concern about its misuse in education. Addressing the role of GenAI in teaching and learning has become an urgent task. This study reports the results of a survey comparing educators’ (n = 68) and university students’ (n = 158) perceptions on the appropriate use of GenAI in the writing process. The survey included representations of user prompts and output from ChatGP…

Education · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-09-07 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

GenAI chatbots like ChatGPT can assist university writing across six tasks from brainstorming to evaluating at a level similar to humans.

Current reading — problem

Educators and students report concern about misuse of GenAI in education and a lack of classroom and institutional preparedness to manage it in the writing process.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1012, v1: “Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process.” Truvace, 2026-09-07. /record/TRV-2026-1012 (accessed at citation time). sha256 ca18dbe81de84bef…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv1ca18dbe81de8…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1012 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.