aceNot quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process
Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can be used to author academic texts at a similar level to what humans are capable of, causing concern about its misuse in education. Addressing the role of GenAI in teaching and learning has become an urgent task. This study reports the results of a survey comparing educators’ (n = 68) and university students’ (n = 158) perceptions on the appropriate use of GenAI in the writing process. The survey included representations of user prompts and output from ChatGP…
Educators and students report concern about misuse of GenAI in education and a lack of classroom and institutional preparedness to manage it in the writing process.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education2023-11-09
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1012, v2: “Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process.” Truvace, 2026-10-26. /record/TRV-2026-1012 (accessed at citation time). sha256 84dc5dd7f927588f…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open.
Direction audit: the gain line stated no AI consequence and was removed.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1012 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.