± HEALTH In our modern society, digital devices, social media platforms, and artificial intelligence (AI) tools have b…+ CLIMATE The growing complexity of electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) operations—driven by grid constraints, ren…± HEALTH Objectives This study aim to develop, compare and internally validate machine-learning models for predicting…+ HEALTH Diabetes management faces a number of obstacles, such as fragmented healthcare data, privacy concerns, poor e…− SCIENCE Background Craniofacial soft tissue thickness (CFSTT) is a critical parameter in forensic facial reconstructi…+ HEALTH Background Technological innovation in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has largely focused on intraoperative p…± HEALTH Infective endocarditis (IE) continues to be an often fatal condition despite improvements in cardiac surgical…± HEALTH Purpose of review Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is the leading cause of d…
TruaceTracing the truth around AISaturday, September 12, 2026
Subscribe
TRV-2026-0999Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning

Introduction: This mixed methods study examines the effects of AI-mediated language instruction on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. It addresses the increasing interest in AI-driven educational technologies and their potential to revolutionize language instruction. Methods: Two intact classes, consisting of a total of 60 university students, participated in this study. The experimental group received AI-mediated instructi…

Policy · G Space — documented gain · certified 2026-09-06 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

University EFL students receiving AI-mediated language instruction showed higher English achievement across grammar, vocabulary, reading and writing, plus increased L2 motivation and greater use of self-regulated learning strategies compared to traditional instruction.

What this doesn’t fix

Findings are based on a small sample of 60 university students in two intact classes, with qualitative insights from only 14 students in the experimental group, limiting generalizability.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0999, v1: “Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning.” Truvace, 2026-09-06. /record/TRV-2026-0999 (accessed at citation time). sha256 6a7daad8bb5ada83…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv16a7daad8bb5a…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0999 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.