± HEALTH Objective To evaluate the accuracy, completeness, clarity, source transparency, and readability of leading AI…+ HEALTH Background Early prediction of in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients can aid clinicians in optimiz…+ HEALTH Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, with changes in gut microbiota composition a…+ SCIENCE Fire ants (Solenopsis spp. Westwood) pose a major ecological and economic threat, mainly due to the invasive…± HEALTH Objectives The current study aimed to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of commonly utilized chatbots includin…+ HEALTH Objective Despite elevated risk for epilepsy following traumatic brain injury (TBI), there are limited tools…± HEALTH Timely and accurate diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is critical in military operation…+ HEALTH Colorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits substantial metabolic heterogeneity. This study developed a robust prognosti…
TruaceTracing the truth around AIWednesday, August 5, 2026
Subscribe
TRV-2026-0479Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Artificial intelligence in nursing practice: a qualitative study of nurses’ perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and ethical implications

BACKGROUND: The study aims to explore nurses' views on the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) in nursing, focusing on their understanding, practical applications, ethical considerations, and perceived opportunities and threats. METHODS: This qualitative study used semi[Formula: see text]structured interviews to gain comprehensive insights from clinical nurses, adhering to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research for methodological rigor. After obtaining ethical approval, researchers conducted semi[F…

Health · G Space — documented gain · certified 2026-07-22 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

Clinical nurses perceived that AI applied in nursing practice could reduce workload and improve efficiency and patient care.

What this doesn’t fix

Findings are based on a small qualitative sample of 25 clinical nurses and do not include patient and public perspectives, limiting generalizability to broader nursing populations and care contexts.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0479, v1: “Artificial intelligence in nursing practice: a qualitative study of nurses’ perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and ethical implications.” Truvace, 2026-07-22. /record/TRV-2026-0479 (accessed at citation time). sha256 06bd8cb36cf7bce1…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv106bd8cb36cf7…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0479 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.