aceGarbage in, garbage out? How the monster of AI art reflects human fault, bias, and capitalism in contemporary culture
Abstract This paper examines the relationship between artificial intelligence, contemporary artistic production and content creation through an intersectional feminist framework, arguing that AI operates as a reflective system that reproduces and amplifies existing social, economic, and cultural biases. Beginning with examples of AI artistic collaborations such as 'What I Saw Before the Darkness', and 'Théâtre D'opéra Spatial' the research investigates how generative AI exposes underlying tensions surrounding cr…
Generative art systems accelerate inequities in visual arts by appropriating intellectual property from marginalised artists and reinforcing Eurocentric and gendered commodification.
Findings are bounded by current model capabilities, which the paper notes are limited to replicating established styles rather than producing novel aesthetics.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedAI & SOCIETY2026-01-21
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0394, v1: “Garbage in, garbage out? How the monster of AI art reflects human fault, bias, and capitalism in contemporary culture.” Truvace, 2026-07-20. /record/TRV-2026-0394 (accessed at citation time). sha256 c7001917750171c6…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0394 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.