aceAlgorithmic Justice and Responsible AI Journalism: A Comparative Communication Policy Perspective in East Asia
As generative artificial intelligence and automated content curation rapidly reshape the global media landscape, the intersection of algorithmic justice and media governance has become a critical frontier for sustainable development. This study provides a comparative communication policy analysis of China and South Korea, focusing explicitly on how their distinct regulatory toolkits address the tension between algorithmic fairness and platform accountability in AI journalism. While China utilizes a top-down, sta…
Chinese and South Korean regulatory toolkits for AI journalism on platforms like Toutiao and Naver were found to mitigate risks of digital infodemics and algorithmic bias.
The same Chinese and South Korean regulatory models for AI journalism face contrasting trade-offs between regulatory efficiency and editorial independence.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedPhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)2026-12-31
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0247, v1: “Algorithmic Justice and Responsible AI Journalism: A Comparative Communication Policy Perspective in East Asia.” Truvace, 2026-07-17. /record/TRV-2026-0247 (accessed at citation time). sha256 3ac801ce1e486ccf…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0247 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.