TruaceTracing the truth around AIWednesday, July 15, 2026
TRV-2026-0226Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Advancing Decision-Making through AI-Human Collaboration: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework

Abstract The interplay between humans and artificial intelligence (AI) in decision-making has become increasingly intricate and significant. Despite rapid advancements, the literature remains fragmented, with limited integrative frameworks to explain how AI-human dynamics and decision-making typologies shape outcomes. This study addresses this critical gap by conducting a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of 627 articles, culminating in a novel conceptual framework. The framework identifies two critica…

Science · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-07-15 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of 627 articles produced a conceptual framework with two dimensions and four paradigms that advances theoretical understanding of hybrid decision-making and provides actionable insights for organizations in AI-driven environments.

Current reading — problem

Existing literature on AI-human decision-making was fragmented and lacked integrative frameworks to explain how AI-human dynamics and decision typologies shape outcomes despite increasingly intricate human-AI interplay.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0226, v1: “Advancing Decision-Making through AI-Human Collaboration: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework.” Truvace, 2026-07-15. /record/TRV-2026-0226 (accessed at citation time). sha256 8b6fca4a799222f4

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv18b6fca4a7992

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0226 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.