− CLIMATE — Artificial intelligence is often associated with ludicrous amounts of electricity, and therefore planet-heati…+ EDUCATION — While many schools in England have banned smartphones, in Estonia – regarded as the new European education po…− EDUCATION — In a Cambridge classroom, Joseph, 10, trained his AI model to discern between drawings of apples and drawings…− EDUCATION — OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently told a US podcast that if he was graduating today, “I would feel like the luck…− EDUCATION — I disagree with the decision of lecturers to use artificial intelligence to create teaching materials (‘We co…− BUSINESS — Americans are growing worried about what artificial intelligence portends for their futures. Eight in 10 Amer…− BUSINESS — Accenture has reportedly begun calling its near 800,000 employees “reinventors”, as the consultancy tries to…− LABOR — US workers overwhelmingly support pro-worker policies on artificial intelligence (AI) and view labor unions a…
TruaceTracing the truth around AISunday, July 12, 2026
Subscribe
TRV-2026-0063Version 3 · Sources changed

Written 2026-07-12 20:51:09 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Source set updated

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-0063
version: 3
kind: sources_changed
reason: Source set updated
timestamp: 2026-07-12T20:51:09.232322Z
status: published
lens: g_space
sector: health
headline: Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review
dek: Background Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, together with the availability of big data in society, creates uncertainties about how these developments will affect healthcare systems worldwide. Compassion is essential for high-quality healthcare and research shows how prosocial caring behaviors benefit human health and societies. However, the possible association between AI technologies and compassion is under conceptualized and underexplored. Objectives The aim of this scoping review is to provide a comprehensive depth and a balanced perspective of the emerging topic of AI technologies and compassion, to inform future research and practice. The review questions were: How is compassion discussed in relation to AI technologies in healthcare? How are AI technologies being used to enhance compassion in healthcare? What are the gaps in current knowledge and unexplored …
gain_reading: Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review: Compassion is essential for high-quality healthcare and research shows how prosocial caring behaviors benefit human health and societies.
problem_reading: (none)
limitation: Historical evidence reading: the cited study may be limited by its design, population, period, or setting, and later research may report different effects.
tag: Evidence-backed gain
key_points: Background Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, together with the availability of big data in society, creates uncertainties about how these developments will affect healthcare systems worldwide. | Compassion is essential for high-quality healthcare and research shows how prosocial caring behaviors benefit human health and societies. | However, the possible association between AI technologies and compassion is under conceptualized and underexplored.
rundown: Background Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, together with the availability of big data in society, creates uncertainties about how these developments will affect healthcare systems worldwide. Compassion is essential for high-quality healthcare and research shows how prosocial caring behaviors benefit human health and societies.

However, the possible association between AI technologies and compassion is under conceptualized and underexplored. Objectives The aim of this scoping review is to provide a comprehensive depth and a balanced perspective of the emerging topic of AI technologies and compassion, to inform future research and practice.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | Frontiers in Psychology | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044 | 2023-01-17
- peer_reviewed | Frontiers in Psychology | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1583565 | 2026-01-14
- peer_reviewed | Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society | https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v7i1.31655 | 2024-10-16
prev: d8e7dda7577cc64d37693d248139643f5a97d01f6c8db334250d9ecc252998a0
sha256
b99a4a5077302310bfc198e4da63db0b77a8bca23046d2c141ba589fdce70332
previous
d8e7dda7577cc64d37693d248139643f5a97d01f6c8db334250d9ecc252998a0
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0063 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.