TRV-2026-0060Version 3 · Retracted
Reason for this version
Model backfill: source did not support a publishable AI-impact claim
Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)
TRUVACE RECORD VERSION record: TRV-2026-0060 version: 3 kind: retracted reason: Model backfill: source did not support a publishable AI-impact claim timestamp: 2026-07-13T00:38:39.279404Z status: archived lens: p_space sector: policy headline: AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations dek: This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium-EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a "Good AI Society". We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations-to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI-which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by… gain_title: (none) problem_title: We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations-to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI-which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by other stakeholders. trace_subject: (none) gain_reading: (none) problem_reading: We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations-to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI-which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by other stakeholders. quick_read: This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium-EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a "Good AI Society". We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations-to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI-which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by other stakeholders. If adopted, these recommendations would serve as a firm foundation for the establishment of a Good AI Society. limitation: Historical evidence reading: the cited study may be limited by its design, population, period, or setting, and later research may report different effects. tag: Evidence-backed problem key_points: This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium-EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a "Good AI Society". | If adopted, these recommendations would serve as a firm foundation for the establishment of a Good AI Society. rundown: This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium-EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a "Good AI Society". We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations-to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI-which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by other stakeholders. If adopted, these recommendations would serve as a firm foundation for the establishment of a Good AI Society. sources: - peer_reviewed | Minds and Machines | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 | 2018-11-25 prev: 33ebe161b70235646a5ae3ed86a691b7a882b58732a09b8c95d3f0ea95135557
- sha256
- 6344f6a7c90657ca730fa3d5e245931a10982ea0a287cc794fe071254c217e78
- previous
- 33ebe161b70235646a5ae3ed86a691b7a882b58732a09b8c95d3f0ea95135557
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0060 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.