The impact of robot-assisted language learning (RALL) on EFL students’ classroom engagement and willingness to attend classes (WTAC): A technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective
Recently, a surge of scholarly attention has been paid to the impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools on second/foreign language (L2) education. Nonetheless, there is a lack of evidence on the role of AI-assisted robots or robot-assisted language learning (RALL) in English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ psycho-emotional factors and academic behaviors. To address this gap, drawing on the technology acceptance model (TAM), the present study probed into the impact of robot-assisted L2 education on Chin…

"Language Day May 14 2010" by Presidio of Monterey: DLIFLC & USAG is marked with Public Domain Mark 1.0. To view the terms, visit https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/.
In a four-month randomized trial reported April 30, 2026, 155 Chinese EFL students were split into a control group of 80 and an experimental group of 75 that received robot-assisted language instruction. Questionnaires at the start and end measured classroom engagement and willingness to attend classes.
The reported improvement suggests AI robots can influence attendance motivation and in-class participation, not just language scores. It remains unclear whether effects persist beyond four months, transfer to other cultural contexts or proficiency levels, or depend on specific robot design and teacher integration.
- Randomized controlled trial with 155 Chinese EFL students assigned to control (n=80) and experimental (n=75) groups over four months.
- Intervention was robot-assisted L2 instruction evaluated through the technology acceptance model (TAM) framework.
- Outcomes measured via questionnaires at start and end of intervention; analysis of covariance showed significant gains in engagement and WTAC for experimental group.
Chinese EFL students who received robot-assisted language instruction showed significantly higher classroom engagement and willingness to attend classes after a four-month intervention compared to controls.
The rundown
The study addressed a gap in evidence on AI-assisted robots in L2 education by testing psycho-emotional and behavioral outcomes. Using TAM as a lens, researchers administered two questionnaires pre- and post-intervention to 155 students randomly assigned to groups.
Results from analysis of covariance indicated the experimental group improved on both measures due to robot-assisted instruction. Authors discuss implications for EFL educators and policymakers regarding adopting AI robots in L2 education.
Sources
- Peer-reviewedLanguage Teaching Research2026-04-30
How should this claim be treated?
ace
The debate