± SCIENCE Today’s artificial intelligence still faces two major challenges. One is that, in most industries, data exist…+ SCIENCE Deep learning takes on protein folding In 1972, Anfinsen won a Nobel prize for demonstrating a connection bet…± SCIENCE Significance Deep neural networks are currently the most successful machine-learning technique for solving a…+ SCIENCE Deep learning allows computational models that are composed of multiple processing layers to learn representa…+ HEALTH For the task of analyzing survival data to derive risk factors associated with mortality, physicians, researc…+ SCIENCE Artificial intelligence (AI) coupled with promising machine learning (ML) techniques well known from computer…+ SCIENCE Deep learning is revolutionizing many areas of science and technology, especially image, text, and speech rec…+ SCIENCE Current deep-learning models are mostly built upon neural networks, i.e. multiple layers of parameterized dif…
TruaceTracing the truth around AIMonday, July 13, 2026
Subscribe
Health·G Space·Evidence-backed gain·Published 2026-07-13

Random Forest

For the task of analyzing survival data to derive risk factors associated with mortality, physicians, researchers, and biostatisticians have typically relied on certain types of regression techniques, most notably the Cox model. With the advent of more widely distributed computing power, methods which require more complex mathematics have become increasingly common. Particularly in this era of "big data" and machine learning, survival analysis has become methodologically broader. This paper aims to explore one t…

TRV-2026-0208Peer-reviewedPermanent record — cite & verify
Random Forest

SEER Self Instructional Manuals for Cancer Registrars - Book 8 - Antineoplastic Drugs (Third Edition, 1993) by National Institutes of Health. Public domain

The quick read

Published in 2017, this methods paper explored Random Forest as an alternative to Cox regression for survival analysis. Using 66,807 colon cancer cases from the SEER database, the authors built both a Cox model and a Random Forest model to derive mortality-associated risk factors and compared their predictive performance.

The comparison matters because it demonstrates that a machine learning approach using bootstrap aggregation and randomization of predictors can match traditional biostatistical methods for cancer prognosis, achieving about 18% concordance error. What remains uncertain from the text is how the models would perform outside this SEER colon cancer sample or in prospective clinical use.

Main points
  • Study compared traditional Cox model to Random Forest for survival data analysis
  • Used colon cancer data (n = 66,807) from the SEER database
  • Random Forest described as using bootstrap aggregation and randomization of predictors
  • Both models achieved concordance error rate of approximately 18%
Gain

Random Forest survival model achieved comparable predictive accuracy to Cox regression on colon cancer mortality data, with low concordance error.

The rundown

The paper frames survival analysis as traditionally reliant on Cox regression, noting that more computationally intensive methods have become common in the era of big data and machine learning.

Authors constructed both a Cox model and a Random Forest model on the same SEER colon cancer cohort of 66,807 cases to compare performance on identical data.

Sources

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

The debate