Do bots provide correct and adequate guidance regarding acidity: A blinded comparison rated by patients and physicians
Background Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly accessed by patients for gastrointestinal health information. Despite their growing use, concerns persist regarding accuracy, empathy, actionability, and readability of responses generated by LLMs. Aim To assess the responses generated by ChatGPT-5, Gemini-2.5, and Claude-4 for common patient questions on "acidity" (heartburn/dyspepsia/gastroesophageal reflux disease). Methods Thirty-nine frequently asked questions were submitted to each model. Responses w…

In brief
Background Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly accessed by patients for gastrointestinal health information. Despite their growing use, concerns persist regarding accuracy, empathy, actionability, and readability of responses generated by LLMs.
Aim To assess the responses generated by ChatGPT-5, Gemini-2.5, and Claude-4 for common patient questions on "acidity" (heartburn/dyspepsia/gastroesophageal reflux disease). Responses were independently rated by three gastroenterologists for accuracy, comprehensiveness, empathy, and actionability; and by 20 patients for empathy, comprehensiveness, actionability, compassion, and usefulness.
Main points
- Background Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly accessed by patients for gastrointestinal health information.
- Aim To assess the responses generated by ChatGPT-5, Gemini-2.5, and Claude-4 for common patient questions on "acidity" (heartburn/dyspepsia/gastroesophageal reflux disease).
- Methods Thirty-nine frequently asked questions were submitted to each model.
The problem
Despite their growing use, concerns persist regarding accuracy, empathy, actionability, and readability of responses generated by LLMs.
The rundown
Aim To assess the responses generated by ChatGPT-5, Gemini-2.5, and Claude-4 for common patient questions on "acidity" (heartburn/dyspepsia/gastroesophageal reflux disease). Methods Thirty-nine frequently asked questions were submitted to each model.
Sources
- Peer-reviewedWorld Journal of Methodology2026-09-20
ace
The debate