Do bots provide correct and adequate guidance regarding acidity: A blinded comparison rated by patients and physicians

Background Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly accessed by patients for gastrointestinal health information. Despite their growing use, concerns persist regarding accuracy, empathy, actionability, and readability of responses generated by LLMs. Aim To assess the responses generated by ChatGPT-5, Gemini-2.5, and Claude-4 for common patient questions on "acidity" (heartburn/dyspepsia/gastroesophageal reflux disease). Methods Thirty-nine frequently asked questions were submitted to each model. Responses w…

Do bots provide correct and adequate guidance regarding acidity: A blinded comparison rated by patients and physicians
Hospital Universitari Doctor Peset, València 10 by 19Tarrestnom65. CC BY-SA 4.0 · https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

In brief

Background Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly accessed by patients for gastrointestinal health information. Despite their growing use, concerns persist regarding accuracy, empathy, actionability, and readability of responses generated by LLMs.

Aim To assess the responses generated by ChatGPT-5, Gemini-2.5, and Claude-4 for common patient questions on "acidity" (heartburn/dyspepsia/gastroesophageal reflux disease). Responses were independently rated by three gastroenterologists for accuracy, comprehensiveness, empathy, and actionability; and by 20 patients for empathy, comprehensiveness, actionability, compassion, and usefulness.

Main points

  1. Background Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly accessed by patients for gastrointestinal health information.
  2. Aim To assess the responses generated by ChatGPT-5, Gemini-2.5, and Claude-4 for common patient questions on "acidity" (heartburn/dyspepsia/gastroesophageal reflux disease).
  3. Methods Thirty-nine frequently asked questions were submitted to each model.

The problem

Despite their growing use, concerns persist regarding accuracy, empathy, actionability, and readability of responses generated by LLMs.

The rundown

Aim To assess the responses generated by ChatGPT-5, Gemini-2.5, and Claude-4 for common patient questions on "acidity" (heartburn/dyspepsia/gastroesophageal reflux disease). Methods Thirty-nine frequently asked questions were submitted to each model.

Sources

  1. Peer-reviewedWorld Journal of Methodology2026-09-20

The debate