Public attention
30-day English Wikipedia pageviews, normalized across the measured set
AI company impact profile
Loading company impact history and evidence.

AI company impact profile
Maker of ChatGPT and the GPT model line, with a large consumer and developer surface.
Rank #1 · Dominant observable footprint
Falling attention
Data effective Jul 18, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC · recomputed Jul 19, 2026, 6:30 AM UTC
How to read 84
The score normalizes public attention, official developer activity, evidence-backed gains, evidence-backed problems, and source breadth across the measured company set.
It does not mean: that OpenAI is the “best,” safest, most valuable, or most responsible company. Documented problems contribute to visible footprint rather than being hidden as a negative subtraction.
Read the complete methodology →Normalized components
30-day English Wikipedia pageviews, normalized across the measured set
stars and public repositories in the company’s official GitHub organization
independent stored sources attached to company-linked gain readings
independent stored sources attached to company-linked problem readings
unique independent sources in the published Truvace record
Observed history
Fixed 0–100 scale
Lines connect observed snapshots only. Gaps do not mean a score stayed unchanged. Diamond markers indicate a methodology-version transition.
| Effective date | OpenAI |
|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2026 | 85 · visible-impact-v1 |
No interpolation
| Effective | Score | Rank | Gain | Problem | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 85 (+1) | #1 (0) | 85 | 100 | visible-impact-v1 |
| Jul 18, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC | 84 | #1 | 85 | 100 | visible-impact-v1 |
Evidence profile
Private usage, enterprise revenue mix, and internal incident rates are not publicly observable.
Linked to the record
Claims are sorted by their existing Sourced Index impact score. Each card links to its Truvace record and original sources; company marketing is not treated as independent proof.
9 gain · 6 problem · 0 high-evidence
In a first large-scale empirical study published May 2026, researchers examined 1,899 open-source Model Context Protocol servers, the standard introduced by Anthropic in late 2024 to unify tool calling for Foundation Models. Using health metrics and a combined general and MCP-specific scanner, they measured adoption signals and code quality across the ecosystem.
Jul 13, 2026
In a first large-scale empirical study published May 2026, researchers examined 1,899 open-source Model Context Protocol servers, the standard introduced by Anthropic in late 2024 to unify tool calling for Foundation Models. Using health metrics and a combined general and MCP-specific scanner, they measured adoption signals and code quality across the ecosystem.
Jul 13, 2026
In a July 2026 peer-reviewed study, 57 first-year medical students completed 24 paired clinical and foundational questions during a pediatric nephrology and urology case-based session, answering individually, then viewing a ChatGPT-generated answer that was deliberately correct or incorrect, and re-answering.
Jul 17, 2026
In a structured stress test published February 23, 2026, researchers evaluated ChatGPT Health, OpenAI's consumer health tool launched in January 2026, using 60 clinician-authored vignettes across 21 clinical domains under 16 factorial conditions to generate 960 responses, assessing triage recommendations and contextual sensitivity.
Jul 13, 2026
A July 2026 peer-reviewed study compared ChatGPT GPT-5.1, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and Claude Sonnet 4.5 against expert periodontologists on 20 periodontal patient questions. Nine blinded periodontologists rated anonymized answers for scientific accuracy, completeness, conciseness & focus, empathy, and clarity.
Jul 19, 2026
A July 2026 peer-reviewed study compared ChatGPT GPT-5.1, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and Claude Sonnet 4.5 against expert periodontologists on 20 periodontal patient questions. Nine blinded periodontologists rated anonymized answers for scientific accuracy, completeness, conciseness & focus, empathy, and clarity.
Jul 19, 2026
In a July 2026 peer-reviewed study, 57 first-year medical students completed 24 paired clinical and foundational questions during a pediatric nephrology and urology case-based session, answering individually, then viewing a ChatGPT-generated answer that was deliberately correct or incorrect, and re-answering.
Jul 17, 2026
On Dec 7 2024, two teacher-education academics reported an autoethnographic experiment in which each co-produced a creative work with ChatGPT, a poem and a multimodal narrative, and analyzed the process through Don Ihde's alterity relations to explore posthuman creative partnership.
Jul 16, 2026
In a 2026 single-case study in Yanbu, Saudi Arabia, three male elementary students aged 9-11 with dyslexia received GenAI-based visual instruction using ChatGPT-generated visual explanations aligned to their Grade 4 Arabic coursebook. After starting at 0%-10% on comprehension quizzes, they reached 80% or higher across three consecutive sessions and sustained that level in maintenance probes weeks later.
Jul 14, 2026
What happened: In Helsinki, young immigrant men aged 21-35 described routing everyday eating through digital platforms, using apps and chats to find recipes, adapt dishes, and learn techniques, with generative AI tools lowering language and knowledge barriers while also creating frictions like advice overload and cultural mismatch.
Jul 13, 2026
This opinion paper compiles 43 expert contributions to examine transformative tools such as ChatGPT. Contributors describe systems that generate sophisticated human-like text and discuss their applicability across many organizational settings, with particular attention to productivity effects.
Jul 12, 2026
On July 14, 2026, Spotify was reported to be rolling out a new AI-powered conversational feature for Premium subscribers that allows chatting with the app to discover content.
Jul 15, 2026
Recorded changes