TruaceTracing the truth around AISunday, July 19, 2026
TRV-2026-0264Version 1 · Certified

Written 2026-07-19 00:57:20 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Certified into the record

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-0264
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-07-19T00:57:20.922134Z
status: published
lens: g_space
sector: health
headline: Plasma proteomics and machine learning deliver non-invasive distinction between fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
dek: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) manifests as fibrotic (FHP) and non-fibrotic (NFHP) phenotypes. Clinically distinguishing FHP from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains challenging owing to phenotypic overlap, despite divergent management protocols. This investigation sought to develop a plasma proteomics-based framework for differential diagnosis between these entities. A total of 119 subjects were enrolled from the Chinese Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) National Cohort and the PORTRAY IPF Cohort betwe…
gain_title: A six-protein plasma signature tested with SVM distinguished fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis on an independent test set with 71.4% accuracy, offering a non-invasive diagnostic aid.
problem_title: (none)
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: A six-protein plasma signature tested with SVM distinguished fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis on an independent test set with 71.4% accuracy, offering a non-invasive diagnostic aid.
gain_evidence: Among seven machine learning algorithms, support vector machine (SVM) achieved the optimal performance on the independent test set with an accuracy of 71.4%, effectively discriminating FHPs from IPFs.
problem_reading: (none)
problem_evidence: (none)
quick_read: Between July 2018 and June 2022, investigators enrolled 119 subjects across healthy controls, non-fibrotic HP, fibrotic HP, and IPF cohorts and performed plasma proteomic profiling with WGCNA. They identified 813 proteins, noted enrichment of glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and pyruvate metabolism in FHP, and distilled nine differential proteins to a six-protein signature that was used to train seven machine learning classifiers.

The work matters because FHP and IPF overlap clinically but require divergent management, and a blood-based classifier could reduce reliance on invasive or ambiguous workups. By the July 2026 publication date, the result was a validated proof-of-concept with 71.4% accuracy on an independent test set, not yet a deployed clinical test, with generalizability beyond the two Chinese cohorts still unproven.
limitation: 
tag: Evidence-backed gain
key_points: Study enrolled 119 subjects: 32 healthy controls, 31 non-fibrotic HP, 28 fibrotic HP, and 28 IPF from Chinese ILD National Cohort and PORTRAY IPF Cohort. | Quantitative plasma proteomics identified 813 proteins and WGCNA highlighted glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and pyruvate metabolism pathways. | LASSO and recursive feature elimination reduced nine differentially expressed proteins to six-protein signature: H2BC12, SHBG, APCS, PTPRG, IGHV1-58, and GAPDH. | Seven machine learning algorithms were compared to construct diagnostic models, with SVM selected as optimal on independent test set.
rundown: Researchers profiled plasma from 119 participants enrolled between July 2018 and June 2022 and performed quantitative proteomics, WGCNA, and bioinformatics to map disease-associated proteins and modules.

From nine differentially expressed proteins, a six-protein panel was derived and fed into seven machine learning algorithms; the SVM model delivered the best independent test performance at 71.4% accuracy for FHP versus IPF discrimination.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | Journal of Translational Medicine | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-08643-8 | 2026-07-17
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sha256
c1a1dc361a482a6b0a5dcc91806f16eac6446ab23d307619305714292ef0c975
previous
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0264 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.