Truace
Subscribe
Problem Space a ranking of the record

TheProblems surrounding AI

103 problems match this view. 90% rest on at least one peer-reviewed study, and 4% clear the high-evidence bar. The latest was filed Oct 4, 2026.

Every problem in this view, one square each, shaded by the strength of its evidence. High 4 Moderate 99 Emerging 0
103 results
Show filters and sorting
Reset all
Sector: health

Matching records · page 4 of 4

93
Active harmPeer-reviewedHealth

AI-driven differential-diagnosis tools show omission and commission error patterns that haven't been evenly studied across race, age, or income groups — meaning the tool's blind spots may track existing healthcare gaps rather than closing them.

Source article: Diagnostic bias across underrepresented patient groups

NCBI randomized controlled study on AI-driven differential diagnosis
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

99
Evidence-backed problemOfficial statisticsHealth

An FDA malfunction report described the Linq II insertable cardiac monitor's AI algorithm rejecting true pause episodes and generating false ventricular tachycardia detections, with no complications reported to date.

Source article: Linq ii¿ insertable cardiac monitor: FDA malfunction report involving AI

FDA MAUDE report 25093688
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

100
Evidence-backed problemJournalismHealth

He didn’t reveal the attack then, but he sounded a warning about the march of AI: “the risk is that AI develops in a way in which humans are no longer in control of what AI is producing.” But Albanese noted, too, that two countries, the US and China, would dominate the world’s response to the new technology.

Source article: OpenAI hack on Australian government reveals anxiety at heart of global artificial intelligence dilemma

The Guardian
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

101
Evidence-backed problemJournalismHealth

With her liver failing, her skin was a ghostly apricot. The thoughts creep in as we are bombarded by artificial intelligence chief executives making bold proclamations such as “AI will cure cancer in five to 10 years” or “AI will cure cancer in our lifetimes”.

Source article: Big tech says AI can find a cure for cancer. So where is it?

The Guardian
Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?