Rage against the machines: ignore the fury at Wimbledon, AI in sport works | Sean Ingle
We are all suckers for a good story. And there was certainly a cracking two‑parter at Wimbledon this year. First came the news that 300 line judges had been replaced by artificial intelligence robots. Then, a few days later, it turned out there were some embarrassing gremlins in the machine. Not since Roger Federer hung up his Wilson racket has there been a sweeter spot hit during the Wimbledon fortnight. First the new electronic line-judging system failed to spot that Sonay Kartal had whacked a ball long during he
Negative state: both sides are scored from claims and sources, not community votes.

We are all suckers for a good story. And there was certainly a cracking two‑parter at Wimbledon this year.
First came the news that 300 line judges had been replaced by artificial intelligence robots. Long ago, researchers estimated that line judges get around 8% of close calls wrong.
- We are all suckers for a good story.
- And there was certainly a cracking two‑parter at Wimbledon this year.
- First came the news that 300 line judges had been replaced by artificial intelligence robots.
Rage against the machines: ignore the fury at Wimbledon, AI in sport works | Sean Ingle: Another study in Norway found that successful teams were more likely to be given favourable penalty decisions.
Rage against the machines: ignore the fury at Wimbledon, AI in sport works | Sean Ingle: First the new electronic line-judging system failed to spot that Sonay Kartal had whacked a ball long during her match against Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, which led to the Russian losing a game she otherwise would have won.
The rundown
First came the news that 300 line judges had been replaced by artificial intelligence robots. Then, a few days later, it turned out there were some embarrassing gremlins in the machine.
Machine-ingested summary: the claims above reflect a single primary source and have not been weighed against contradicting evidence by a Truvace editor yet.
Sources
- JournalismThe Guardian2025-07-15
The debate