AI electronic line-judging for line calls at Wimbledon 2025
Source article: Rage against the machines: ignore the fury at Wimbledon, AI in sport works | Sean Ingle
Abstract: We are all suckers for a good story. And there was certainly a cracking two‑parter at Wimbledon this year. First came the news that 300 line judges had been replaced by artificial intelligence robots. Then, a few days later, it turned out there were some embarrassing gremlins in the machine. Not since Roger Federer hung up his Wilson racket has there been a sweeter spot hit during the Wimbledon fortnight. First the new electronic line-judging system failed to spot that Sonay Kartal had whacked a ball long during he
Negative state: both sides are scored from claims and sources, not community votes.

At Wimbledon in July 2025, organizers replaced 300 human line judges with an artificial intelligence electronic line-judging system. Shortly after deployment, the new system failed to detect that player Sonay Kartal had hit a ball long during a match.
The case illustrates both automation of sports officiating and the operational risk of errors in high-profile competition. The truncated excerpt does not provide error rates, correction procedures, or longer-term performance data needed to judge reliability.
- Wimbledon implemented a new electronic line-judging system in 2025 described as artificial intelligence robots.
- The deployment replaced approximately 300 human line judges.
- During a match involving Sonay Kartal, the system failed to detect a ball hit long.
- The incident was reported as embarrassing gremlins in the machine days after the replacement was announced.
At Wimbledon 2025, an AI electronic line-judging system was deployed to replace 300 human line judges.
At Wimbledon 2025, the new AI electronic line-judging system failed to spot an out ball hit long by Sonay Kartal.
The rundown
By 15 July 2025, Wimbledon had replaced 300 line judges with an AI electronic line-judging system. Days after the rollout, the system failed during a match to spot that Sonay Kartal had hit a ball long, an incident described as gremlins in the machine.
Automated line-calling matters because it changes officiating jobs and match outcomes at a major tournament. It remains unclear from the excerpt how frequent such errors were, how they were resolved, or whether overall accuracy improved compared to human judges.
Sources
- JournalismThe Guardian2025-07-15
How should this claim be treated?
ace
The debate