TruaceTracing the truth around AIWednesday, August 26, 2026
TRV-2026-0083Certified recordJournalism

Rage against the machines: ignore the fury at Wimbledon, AI in sport works | Sean Ingle

We are all suckers for a good story. And there was certainly a cracking two‑parter at Wimbledon this year. First came the news that 300 line judges had been replaced by artificial intelligence robots. Then, a few days later, it turned out there were some embarrassing gremlins in the machine. Not since Roger Federer hung up his Wilson racket has there been a sweeter spot hit during the Wimbledon fortnight. First the new electronic line-judging system failed to spot that Sonay Kartal had whacked a ball long during he

Sports · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-07-12 · v5 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

At Wimbledon 2025, an AI electronic line-judging system was deployed to replace 300 human line judges.

Current reading — problem

At Wimbledon 2025, the new AI electronic line-judging system failed to spot an out ball hit long by Sonay Kartal.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0083, v5: “Rage against the machines: ignore the fury at Wimbledon, AI in sport works | Sean Ingle.” Truvace, 2026-07-13. /record/TRV-2026-0083 (accessed at citation time). sha256 5aab1be3cef02bbb

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open.

  1. Revisedv55aab1be3cef0

    Model backfill: grounded claim, summary, sector, and trace validation

  2. Revisedv4cb709683dba8

    Model backfill: grounded claim, summary, sector, and trace validation

  3. Certifiedv356567aabcac0

    Restored after model confidence scale normalization

  4. Retractedv295c78e845a02

    Model backfill: source did not support a publishable AI-impact claim

  5. Certifiedv188a3a5bfe8b6

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0083 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.