TruaceTracing the truth around AIWednesday, August 26, 2026
TRV-2026-0092Retracted — remains on the recordJournalism

We Are Not Machines by Sarah O’Connor review – can dignity at work survive the tech revolution?

It’s never been easy to land and keep a decent job. But it feels like it’s getting harder. In June, the number of job vacancies in the UK fell to a five-year low; headlines warn of a looming AI-employment shock. What might the future of work look like – and who or what will shape its terms? In her new book, Sarah O’Connor goes looking for answers in the modern collision of artificial intelligence, automation, and human labour. This clash between human and machine – and the fight to secure decent working conditions

Labor · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-07-12 · v4 · article view · machine-readable

This record was retracted on 2026-07-13Model backfill: source did not support a publishable AI-impact claim. It remains permanently retrievable here, as does every prior version below.
Current reading — gain

Warehouses like EMA4 are supported by remote workers in Costa Rica and India, whose jobs are to monitor video feeds of Amazon shelves, auditing the accuracy of the AI camera systems that track where items are placed.

Current reading — problem

O’Connor has been a reporter at the Financial Times for nearly two decades, and although We Are Not Machines looks to the future, many of the threats AI poses to workers’ dignity and safety look a lot like reconfigurations of old battles.

What this doesn’t fix

Machine-ingested summary: the claims above reflect a single primary source and have not been weighed against contradicting evidence by a Truvace editor yet.

Evidence

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0092, v4: “We Are Not Machines by Sarah O’Connor review – can dignity at work survive the tech revolution?.” Truvace, 2026-07-13. /record/TRV-2026-0092 (accessed at citation time). sha256 23873a4f1eed88dd

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open.

  1. Retractedv423873a4f1eed

    Model backfill: source did not support a publishable AI-impact claim

  2. Certifiedv3ae2453bbab9c

    Restored after model confidence scale normalization

  3. Retractedv241072146e61a

    Model backfill: source did not support a publishable AI-impact claim

  4. Certifiedv13337a6eb4ad2

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0092 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.