Why university lecturers are turning to AI in classes | Letters
I disagree with the decision of lecturers to use artificial intelligence to create teaching materials (‘We could have asked ChatGPT’: students fight back over course taught by AI, 20 November), though I understand the pressures and incentives that they are responding to. As a recent doctoral graduate, I can only get fixed or zero-hours teaching contracts. Each taught hour may take days of preparation that is not accounted for in the pay formula. I have developed material including work plans, assessments, readin…

I disagree with the decision of lecturers to use artificial intelligence to create teaching materials (‘We could have asked ChatGPT’: students fight back over course taught by AI, 20 November), though I understand the pressures and incentives that they are responding to. As a recent doctoral graduate, I can only get fixed or zero-hours teaching contracts.
Each taught hour may take days of preparation that is not accounted for in the pay formula. I have developed material including work plans, assessments, reading lists and tutorial tasks for three different modules, requiring much more time than I was paid for.
- I disagree with the decision of lecturers to use artificial intelligence to create teaching materials (‘We could have asked ChatGPT’: students fight back over course taught by AI, 20 November), though I understand the pressures and incentives that they are responding to.
- As a recent doctoral graduate, I can only get fixed or zero-hours teaching contracts.
- Each taught hour may take days of preparation that is not accounted for in the pay formula.
Why university lecturers are turning to AI in classes | Letters: Successive governments’ refusal to invest in higher education has created a situation where the price of quality teaching is paid by teachers.
Sources
- JournalismThe Guardian2025-11-25
The debate